2010
DOI: 10.1378/chest.9915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Positions on Spirometric Values in Obese Asthmatic Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(p=0.05) but it was contrast with the finding of the study done by Aruna G et al The mean of Forced expiratory volume in 1st second (FEV1) and Forced vital capacity (FVC), in obese asthmatics is 1.13 ± 0.24 l/s and 1.61 + 0.38 l/s respectively and in non-obese it is 1.50 + 0.65 l/s and 2.26 + 0.88 l/s. In the present study FEV1, FVC is lower in obese asthmatics compared to non-obese asthmatics which is comparable with the studies done by Pakhale s et al (2010) Dosi R et al, Razi et al 19 The mean percentage change of reversibility in spirometric values (FEV1) among non-obese population is 34.07%, whereas in obese population it is 29.24%. but was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Sample Sizesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…(p=0.05) but it was contrast with the finding of the study done by Aruna G et al The mean of Forced expiratory volume in 1st second (FEV1) and Forced vital capacity (FVC), in obese asthmatics is 1.13 ± 0.24 l/s and 1.61 + 0.38 l/s respectively and in non-obese it is 1.50 + 0.65 l/s and 2.26 + 0.88 l/s. In the present study FEV1, FVC is lower in obese asthmatics compared to non-obese asthmatics which is comparable with the studies done by Pakhale s et al (2010) Dosi R et al, Razi et al 19 The mean percentage change of reversibility in spirometric values (FEV1) among non-obese population is 34.07%, whereas in obese population it is 29.24%. but was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Sample Sizesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Standing values of the FEV 1 and/or FVC exceeded sitting values by 0.04-0.07 L (37,41). Studies comparing these postures have also reported no significant differences in FEV 1 and/or FVC (35,37,40). Although small, changes in FEV 1 and FVC related to posture may be significant when evaluating spirometry longitudinally.…”
Section: Posture During Spirometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To clarify whether standing versus sitting impacts spirometry results in the workplace, a systematic review of the medical literature was performed. The search identified seven relevant studies (see Table E2) (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41), although none were performed in an occupational setting. Two studies found significant postural effects.…”
Section: Posture During Spirometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Razi and Moosavi (2007) 9 conducted a study on adult obese asthmatics and compared their spirometric values to normal weight asthmatics, and concluded that spirometric values in obese asthmatic patients with BMI ≥30 were not affected by the standing or sitting positions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solid information on the effects of position and body weight on forced expiratory manoeuvres in children is still lacking. Thus there is need for investigating if spirometric indices (forced expiratory volume in first second [FEV1], forced vital capacity [FEV], forced expiratory flow after 50% of FVC [FEF 50] and peak expiratory flow [PEF]) were affected by body weight or testing posture or not 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%