1996
DOI: 10.1017/s0016672300034030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of population size on effective population size: an empirical study in the red flour beetleTribolium castaneum

Abstract: Despite the increasing number of studies on the magnitude of NJN ratios, much remains unknown about the effects of demographic and environmental variables on NJN. We determined NJN for seven population size treatments, ranging from N = 2 to N = 960, in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. NJN decreased with increasing N, as evidenced by a significant negative relationship between log N and NJN. Our results are consistent with other published data on the relationship between NJN and N. Effective population… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(49 reference statements)
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether plastic or genetically based (Piche et al 2008), such trends may indicate a shift to earlier maturation as male parr in this system. Second, density dependence is also a prerequisite for genetic compensation, where reduced variance in individual reproductive success underpins increased N e /N ratios at low population size (Pray et al 1996;Ardren and Kapuscinski 2003;Fraser et al 2007b;Watts et al 2007). We observed such relationships in both rivers considered in demographic detail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Whether plastic or genetically based (Piche et al 2008), such trends may indicate a shift to earlier maturation as male parr in this system. Second, density dependence is also a prerequisite for genetic compensation, where reduced variance in individual reproductive success underpins increased N e /N ratios at low population size (Pray et al 1996;Ardren and Kapuscinski 2003;Fraser et al 2007b;Watts et al 2007). We observed such relationships in both rivers considered in demographic detail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Hauser et al's (2002) estimates of the N e /N C ratio were constant (1.8-2.8 9 10 -5 ) over periods of 22-48 years in snapper (Pagrus auratus), an exploited fish in New Zealand. Pray et al (1996) calculated the N e /N C ratio in seven population size treatments of the red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum) where the N C ranged from two to 960. They found that the N e /N C ratio decreased as census size increased-large populations had a proportionally smaller N e /N C ratio than small populations.…”
Section: Comparison Of N E Estimators and Bottleneck Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A greater variance in reproductive output among individuals in species that have large census sizes, or more drastically fluctuating populations, could explain a general tendency for highly abundant organisms to have smaller N e /N ratios (Frankham 1995b; Pray et al 1996; Hedrick 2005). Although high fecundity per se need not result in high fecundity variance (Nunney 1996), ‘sweepstakes’ effects and sexual selection that diminish the number of successfully breeding adults may be important in a variety of taxa, from plants to both terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates (Frankham 1995b; Pray et al 1996; Boudry et al 2002; Hedrick 2005); high reproductive skew changes expectations about how genetic drift works in relation to population size (Eldon & Wakeley 2006; Der et al 2012).…”
Section: Hyperdiverse Eukaryotes In Naturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although high fecundity per se need not result in high fecundity variance (Nunney 1996), ‘sweepstakes’ effects and sexual selection that diminish the number of successfully breeding adults may be important in a variety of taxa, from plants to both terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates (Frankham 1995b; Pray et al 1996; Boudry et al 2002; Hedrick 2005); high reproductive skew changes expectations about how genetic drift works in relation to population size (Eldon & Wakeley 2006; Der et al 2012). Genetic draft will further exacerbate small N e /N ratios for abundant species (Gillespie 2001).…”
Section: Hyperdiverse Eukaryotes In Naturementioning
confidence: 99%