2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of polyacrylamide drag reducing agent on friction factor and heat transfer coefficient in laminar, transition and turbulent flow regimes in circular pipes with different diameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be attributed to the significant level of turbulence, and the frictional pressure gradient in the smaller pipe diameter compared to the larger diameter. These results are in good agreement with the findings of (Varnaseri and Peyghambarzadeh 2020). According to the elastic sub-layer model proposed by Virk (Virk, Sherman et al 1997), as the concentration of additives increases, the elastic sub-layer expands, and the friction factor decreases.…”
Section: Effect Of the Pipe Diametersupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be attributed to the significant level of turbulence, and the frictional pressure gradient in the smaller pipe diameter compared to the larger diameter. These results are in good agreement with the findings of (Varnaseri and Peyghambarzadeh 2020). According to the elastic sub-layer model proposed by Virk (Virk, Sherman et al 1997), as the concentration of additives increases, the elastic sub-layer expands, and the friction factor decreases.…”
Section: Effect Of the Pipe Diametersupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, the mechanism of DRPs and the level of drag reduction have been investigated extensively and attributed to the flowrate (Li, Sun et al 2022), the concentration of DRPs (Wei, Jia et al 2022), temperature (Orang and Pouranfard 2022), flow channel geometry (Varnaseri andPeyghambarzadeh 2020, Ayegba, Edomwonyi-Otu et al 2021), flow orientation (Al-Wahaibi, Abubakar et al 2017), phase distribution (Shah, Ghaemi et al 2022, Tan, Hu et al 2022, and DRP molecular weight and its bond structure Mowla 2013, Eshrati, Al-Wahaibi et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some investigations, it was argued that there was an interaction between the viscoelastic property of drag-reducing polymer solution and the intensity of the turbulent flow. The viscoelastic property of the polymer solution could reduce the intensity of the turbulent flow. Large aggregates and polymer entanglements may play a significant part in the turbulent DR mechanism. The existence of a polymer in the turbulent flow reduces the shear stress at the wall as a result of the viscoelastic properties of the polymer solution. , As can be seen from Figures and , zwitterionic PAM exhibits the most excellent viscosity-enhancing property in solution and therefore the most obvious viscoelasticity in water, thus maximizing the suppression of energy dissipation due to turbulent vortices during flow.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since as the pipe diameter and flow velocity increase, there is a reduction in the estimated error. Pipes with smaller diameters present an impediment in the flow of energy, resulting in changes in the viscosity of the fluid, making it difficult to pass (Varnaseri & Peyghambarzadeh, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%