The Effect of Police Response Time on Crime Clearance Rates

Abstract

Police agencies devote vast resources to minimising the time that it takes them to attend the scene of a crime. Despite this, the long-standing consensus is that police response time has no meaningful effect on the likelihood of catching offenders. We revisit this question using a uniquely rich dataset from the Greater Manchester Police. To identify causal effects, we use a novel strategy that exploits discontinuities in distance to the response station across locations next to each other, but on different sides of division boundaries. Contrary to previous evidence, we find large and strongly significant effects: in our preferred estimate, a 10% increase in response time leads to a 4.7 percentage points decrease in the likelihood of clearing the crime. We find stronger effects for thefts than for violent offenses, although the effects are large for every type of crime. We find suggestive evidence in support of two mechanisms: the likelihood of an immediate arrest and the likelihood that a suspect will be named by a victim or witness both increase as response time becomes faster. We argue that, under conservative assumptions, hiring an additional response officer would generate a benefit, in terms of future crime prevented, equivalent to 170% of her payroll cost. JEL classification: D29, K40. * This paper was previously circulated with the title 'The Effect of Police Response Time on Crime Detection'. We thank Yona Rubinstein for his support and invaluable insights throughout this project. Juliane Thieme typed it, edited it, simplified and occasionally embellished the language. We also thank

It Could Be Worse...It Could Be Raining: Ambulance Response Time and Health Outcomes

“…Response time is also important in other types of emergencies. For instance, Blanes i Vidal and Kirchmaier (2017) show that police response time is a crucial determinant of clearance rate.…”

Examining the Clearance Rates of Violent and Non-Violent Offences in the United States: A Trend Analysis, 2011–2018

“…Others believe that clearance rates are affected more by the lack of solvability factors (Hirschy, 2003;Keppel & Weis, 1992;Wellford & Cronin, 2000). On the other hand, there are researchers who directly or indirectly put the burden of clearance rates directly on the law enforcement agencies by criticizing the response time to crime scenes as a factor that affects the clearance rates (Blanes i Vidal & Kirchmaier, 2017;Brookman et al, 2018). Nonetheless, when questioning police effectiveness, it should be noted that its effectiveness is first affected by the intervening factors such as resources available, the manpower, the workload, the innovative efforts (utilization of technology), diversity of the police force, collaboration between agencies, and the agency size (Avdija, 2019b;Carter & Carter, 2015;Skogan, 1976;Worrall, 2016).…”

“…The most obvious factors that affect the clearance rates include lack of solvability factors in more serious crimes, lack of police resources, police response time, the number of offenders and victims involved, victim-offender relationship, witness-offender relationship, time of incident, department size, the volume of crimes, etc. (Alderden & Lavery, 2007;Avdija, 2019a;Blanes i Vidal & Kirchmaier, 2017;Greenwood & Petersilia, 1975;Jarvis et al, 2017;Mouzos & Muller, 2001;Wellford & Cronin, 2000). Some of these factors are affected by the nature of the offense itself and by the offender, while other factors, on the other hand, are within the control of the law enforcement agencies.…”

Autonomous First Response Drone-Based Smart Rescue System for Critical Situation Management in Future Wireless Networks

“…The metrics considered included the monthly cost of implementing and maintaining the system. There are two methods used by the police to reduce response time to a critical situation [18]. The first method is hiring one additional response officer (M1) and the second is the relocation of response stations (M2).…”