2021
DOI: 10.1080/07421222.2021.1990612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Platform Intervention Policies on Fake News Dissemination and Survival: An Empirical Examination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasingly, not only human actors but also bots (Salge et al., 2022) are spreading fake news (Hajli et al., 2022; Ross et al., 2019), thereby creating additional challenges in fake news mitigation interventions. In this regard, several mitigation interventions have been examined, including measures such as fact‐checking, fake news reporting, automatic fake news detection, flagging and correcting false news, forwarding restrictions, identity verification, verification badges, and different kinds of ratings, such as article or source ratings by users and experts (Gimpel et al., 2021; King et al., 2021; Moravec et al., 2019; Ng et al., 2021; Schuetz et al., 2021; Wang, Pang, et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasingly, not only human actors but also bots (Salge et al., 2022) are spreading fake news (Hajli et al., 2022; Ross et al., 2019), thereby creating additional challenges in fake news mitigation interventions. In this regard, several mitigation interventions have been examined, including measures such as fact‐checking, fake news reporting, automatic fake news detection, flagging and correcting false news, forwarding restrictions, identity verification, verification badges, and different kinds of ratings, such as article or source ratings by users and experts (Gimpel et al., 2021; King et al., 2021; Moravec et al., 2019; Ng et al., 2021; Schuetz et al., 2021; Wang, Pang, et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar et al, 2018). Fail-ing to stop fake content from spreading on online platforms will reinforce filter bubbles and generate extreme emotions and highly polarized opinions (Allcott & Gentzkow, 2017;Ng et al, 2021;Vosoughi et al, 2018), or being exploited by threat actors to manipulate the business environment…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To effectively curb the spread of fake content, intelligent screening systems must be developed that can maximize the accuracy of assessing deceptive content, as failure to do so may lead to devastating consequences that undermine the value of online content (Cui et al., 2018; S. Kumar et al., 2018). Failing to stop fake content from spreading on online platforms will reinforce filter bubbles and generate extreme emotions and highly polarized opinions (Allcott & Gentzkow, 2017; Ng et al., 2021; Vosoughi et al., 2018), or being exploited by threat actors to manipulate the business environment (Lee et al., 2018). However, legitimate content could be wrongly labeled with the presence of false alarms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations