2018
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiy236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Plasmodium on the Outcome of Ebola Virus Infection in a Mouse Model

Abstract: Following the Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa, several studies investigated whether there was an effect of Plasmodium coinfection on survival in Ebola virus (EBOV) disease patients. Different effects of coinfection were found in different patient cohorts. To determine whether an effect of Plasmodium coinfection on EBOV survival may exist, we modeled coinfection of Plasmodium yoelii and mouse-adapted EBOV (MA-EBOV) in CD1 mice. Subsequent infection with MA-EBOV at different time points after P. yoelii infec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings demonstrate that acute Plasmodium infection generates sufficient IFN-g to protect against a low, but uniformly lethal, dose of EBOV; however, we found that it is not protective against higher EBOV doses. The inability of Py infection to overcome higher doses of EBOV is consistent with an earlier report that showed that Py infection does not alter morbidity or mortality associated with the administration of 100 LD 50 of EBOV to mice (Rosenke et al, 2018). Recombinant IFN-g administration also protected against low doses, but not high doses, of rVSV/ EBOV GP in Ifnar À/À mice, in a manner similar to protection conferred by acute Py in ma-EBOV studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings demonstrate that acute Plasmodium infection generates sufficient IFN-g to protect against a low, but uniformly lethal, dose of EBOV; however, we found that it is not protective against higher EBOV doses. The inability of Py infection to overcome higher doses of EBOV is consistent with an earlier report that showed that Py infection does not alter morbidity or mortality associated with the administration of 100 LD 50 of EBOV to mice (Rosenke et al, 2018). Recombinant IFN-g administration also protected against low doses, but not high doses, of rVSV/ EBOV GP in Ifnar À/À mice, in a manner similar to protection conferred by acute Py in ma-EBOV studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similarly, IFN-g did not provide protection to pmacs challenged with a 10-fold higher dose of wild-type EBOV (Figure S5C). These data are consistent with our in vivo ma-EBOV findings (Figure 1) and recent reports from others (Rosenke et al, 2018) showing that experimental malaria fails to modulate the course of EVD when mice are challenged with large doses (eg, 100 lethal dose 50 [LD 50 ]) of ma-EBOV. For all experiments, C57BL/6 Ifnar À/À mice were inoculated with 1 3 10 6 Py iRBCs or left untreated.…”
Section: Plasmodium-elicited Protection From Rvsv/ebov Gp Wanes Over Timesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In addition to these observational studies in the field, the two laboratory studies also report the effect of coinfection on mortality in murine models. Rosenke et al 2018 found no effect of coinfection on mortality in mice when challenged with a high dose of MA-EBOV at 100-median lethal dose. In contrast, Rogers et al found that acute Plasmodium infection protected from lethal virus challenge at low (1-iu) MA_EBOV challenge but less so with moderate to high (10-iu and 100-iu) doses.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 80%
“…The model in one study was of CD1 mice infected via intraperitoneal inoculation with Plasmodium yoeli (Py) at a dose of 10 4 parasitized erythrocytes, followed by challenge with mouse-attenuated EBOV (MA-EBOV) at a 100 median lethal dose at different time points post Py infection. In each time-group, 6 mice were followed for survival to 28 days post infection (dpi), and four were euthanised on day 4-dpi to analyse blood and liver RNA concentrations for Py and MA-EBOV [ 49 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation