2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2008.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of piezoresistive microcantilever geometry on cantilever sensitivity during surface stress chemical sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the electrical and mechanical boundary conditions and their impact on the electro-mechanical response of the sensor was compared with the sensor (square cantileverdevice A) reported in Ref. 39. Under surface stress loading of a few milli N/m, the sensor model (device A) depicted change in its nominal resistance (∆R) in mΩ range that matches the experimental values.…”
Section: A Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…On the other hand, the electrical and mechanical boundary conditions and their impact on the electro-mechanical response of the sensor was compared with the sensor (square cantileverdevice A) reported in Ref. 39. Under surface stress loading of a few milli N/m, the sensor model (device A) depicted change in its nominal resistance (∆R) in mΩ range that matches the experimental values.…”
Section: A Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…[Loui et al (2008), Su et al (1996), Saya et al (2005)] Additional designs or sections are proposed by some researchers to their fabricated device for the device protection according to the application purposes. Gel and Shimoyama (2004) have fabricated a protection head for their device to avoid the cantilever from easily being broken during handling as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Piezoresistive Mems Cantilever Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both read out principles have a large potential, the static mode is most often used (as in this thesis) for its relative simplicity. Reported cantilever read out methods are on the basis of changes in capacitance [43,44,54], changes in the piezoresistivity [49,50,55], and optical beam deflection detected with a position sensitive detector, see for example reference [52,56]. These methods have a typical deflection resolution of at best ~1 pm.…”
Section: Cantilever-based Gas Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and a grating depth of 55 The fixed, varied and considered output parameters are given in Table 6.2; results are presented in Fig. 6.5.…”
Section: Device Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation