The Effect of Physician Oral Health Services on Dental Use and Expenditures under General Anesthesia

Abstract

Background: Despite early evidence touting the effectiveness of physician-provided oral health services (POHS), recent evidence suggests these services might have little impact on caries-related outcomes in children. General anesthesia (GA) is often used to treat early childhood caries and may be considered the most extreme utilization outcome. We sought to assess the impact of POHS utilization on dental GA utilization and expenditures. Methods: We used the Medicaid claims of a birth cohort of children born in 2008 in North Carolina ( N = 32,558) to determine the impact of POHS on dental utilization and expenditures under GA for individual children. Children were followed until their eighth birthday. We analyzed the association of the number of prior POHS visits with visit-specific outcomes of dental treatment under GA using population-averaged models fit with generalized estimating equations with exchangeable working correlation structure. Results: Children with 2 or more previous POHS visits had reduced odds of GA (odds ratio [OR] = 0.93; confidence interval [CI], 0.87–0.99; P = 0.029) and expenditures ($114; CI,−$152.61 to −$75.19; P < 0.001) compared to those without physician-provided oral health visits, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and geographic residence. Dental expenditures did not differ between POHS and non-POHS subjects at non-GA visits. Conclusions: POHS decreased the odds of having dental GA treatment and dental expenditures at GA visits. The role of physicians in oral health care can reduce the impact on the most severe outcome—treatment under general anesthesia. Knowledge Transfer Statement: The results of this study have important financial implications for state Medicaid programs and disease management programs trying to mitigate the costs of treating early childhood caries under general anesthesia. Children who receive physician oral health care are less likely to use and more likely to save money on general anesthesia to complete dental treatment.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Preventive Oral Health Care During Wave One

“…Compared to children who received preventive oral health services during medical well-child visits, children who received preventive care from a dentist had greater caries related treatment (4). Recent analysis questions the long-term benefits of physician provided preventive oral health services because over long follow-up periods, differences in caries related treatment and expenditures tend to attenuate (4,(11)(12)(13).…”

Oral health-related interdisciplinary practices among healthcare professionals in Saudi Arabia: Does integrated care exist?

“…In a country (KSA) where the prevalence of uncontrolled type II diabetes is among the highest in the world (77.7%) [ 33 ], oral health knowledge and dentalcare is, therefore, essential. In the same way early childhood caries (ECC) is a prevalent oral health problem with lifelong consequences that affect the child’s health and wellbeing [ 34 ], with financial burden on parents as it often/frequently necessitates the aid of general anesthesia [ 35 ]. Suboptimal knowledge about early signs of dental caries amongst health care providers may cause delayed referrals and place children at high risk of worsening health and chronic illness [ 36 , 37 ].…”

Analysis of paediatric dentistry cases operated under general anaesthesia: is the number of operating rooms sufficient for dental general anaesthesia?

“…A study conducted in Turkey reported that 95% of them had sleep difficulties (12). DGA can reduce caries activity for short-to medium-term and improve children's oral health behaviour, nutritional and laboratory status, as well as their physical and mental health (13)(14)(15)(16). Given the low rates of postoperative complications, dental treatment under GA can be considered as an important and beneficial treatment option for children whose lack of cooperation makes conventional dental treatments impossible (17).…”