2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of photometric redshift uncertainties on galaxy clustering and baryonic acoustic oscillations

Abstract: In the upcoming era of high-precision galaxy surveys, it becomes necessary to understand the impact of redshift uncertainties on cosmological observables. In this paper we explore the effect of sub-percent photometric redshift errors (photo-z errors) on galaxy clustering and baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO). Using analytic expressions and results from 1 000 N -body simulations, we show how photo-z errors modify the amplitude of moments of the 2D power spectrum, their variances, the amplitude of BAO, and th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Photo-z uncertainties make measuring ACFs in tomographic bins more challenging as the uncertainties introduce spurious cross-correlations across the redshift bins (e.g., see Bailoni et al 2017 for a study on the impacts of bin cross-correlations on cosmological parameters) and smear out valuable cosmological information, including the BAO (e.g., as in Chaves-Montero et al 2018). Since the traditional ACF estimators do not account for contamination arising from photo-z uncertainties, the standard tomographic clustering analysis entails estimating N (z), i.e., the number of galaxies as a function of redshift, in each nominal redshift bin and forward modeling the contaminated ACFs using the N (z) estimates (e.g., as in Crocce et al 2016;Balaguera-Antolínez et al 2018;Abbott et al 2018); also see e.g., Newman (2008) for a discussion on estimating N (z).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photo-z uncertainties make measuring ACFs in tomographic bins more challenging as the uncertainties introduce spurious cross-correlations across the redshift bins (e.g., see Bailoni et al 2017 for a study on the impacts of bin cross-correlations on cosmological parameters) and smear out valuable cosmological information, including the BAO (e.g., as in Chaves-Montero et al 2018). Since the traditional ACF estimators do not account for contamination arising from photo-z uncertainties, the standard tomographic clustering analysis entails estimating N (z), i.e., the number of galaxies as a function of redshift, in each nominal redshift bin and forward modeling the contaminated ACFs using the N (z) estimates (e.g., as in Crocce et al 2016;Balaguera-Antolínez et al 2018;Abbott et al 2018); also see e.g., Newman (2008) for a discussion on estimating N (z).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photometric imaging surveys, on the other hand, provide a less accurate estimation of the redshifts of galaxies (photometric redshifts or photo-zs) from the color information obtained through multi-band photometry using a small number of filters (e.g., Salvato, Ilbert & Hoyle 2019). This method allows one to estimate the redshifts of a significantly larger number of galaxies (at least an order of magnitude more), at the expense of losing most of the radial information (Benítez, et al 2009;Asorey, Crocce, Gaztañaga & Lewis 2012;Chaves-Montero, Angulo & Hernández-Monteagudo 2018). For that reason, in photometric surveys, instead of the three dimensional galaxy distribution, one usually considers its projection in a number of redshift bins and measures the angular 2-point correlation function or the angular power spectrum (e.g., Crocce, Cabré & Gaztañaga 2011;Asorey, Carrasco Kind, Sevilla-Noarbe, Brunner & Thaler 2016;Budavári, et al 2003;Elvin-Poole, et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining the angular and physical separations of all galaxy pairs and weighting the information should allow more precise BAO measurements. Estrada et al (2009) present an analysis to do so in the context of photometric galaxy clusters and Chaves- Montero et al (2016) analyze the results one expects for surveys that obtain redshifts from narrow-band filters. Etherington & Thomas (2015); Etherington et al (2017) have conducted similar studies on the effect of DES redshift uncertainties on measures of galaxy environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%