1983
DOI: 10.1042/bj2100599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of phenobarbital on the transcriptional activity of liver

Abstract: The effect of phenobarbital on the transcriptional activity of liver was studied by measuring the synthesis of RNA by suspensions of hepatocytes isolated from rats treated with phenobarbital for various time periods. The absolute rates of RNA synthesis by isolated hepatocytes were determined by measuring the incorporation of [3H]orotic acid into RNA as UMP and the specific radioactivity of the UTP pool. The specific radioactivity of the UTP extracted from hepatocytes isolated from phenobarbital-treated rats wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, whereas transcriptional activation of the cytochrome P-450 IIB gene was detected only a few hours after a single administration of PB, induction of GST required several days of regular phenobarbital treatment. These kinetic differences could be explained as follows: in the case of cytochrome P-450 IIB, phenobarbital seems to act essentially at the transcriptional level (34)(35)(36)(37), whereas in GST induction posttranscriptional mechanisms predominate (38). With regard to AGP modulation, direct transcriptional activation by PB seems to predominate (19), and the lag time before increased gene expression could be the consequence of a more complex pathway involving several intermediate steps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, whereas transcriptional activation of the cytochrome P-450 IIB gene was detected only a few hours after a single administration of PB, induction of GST required several days of regular phenobarbital treatment. These kinetic differences could be explained as follows: in the case of cytochrome P-450 IIB, phenobarbital seems to act essentially at the transcriptional level (34)(35)(36)(37), whereas in GST induction posttranscriptional mechanisms predominate (38). With regard to AGP modulation, direct transcriptional activation by PB seems to predominate (19), and the lag time before increased gene expression could be the consequence of a more complex pathway involving several intermediate steps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subfamily of CYP2B genes is induced by barbiturates (Fujii-Kuriyama et al 1982;Mizukami et al 1983), which are central nervous system depressants, affecting the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) system via modulating GABA A receptors. Hepatic transcription of CYP2B genes is highly inducible by phenobarbital (PB) and PB-like inducers (Adesnik et al 1981;Hardwick et al 1983;Gervot et al 1999) through the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR), pregnane X receptor (PXR) (Sueyoshi et al 1999;Moore et al 2000) and glucocorticoids receptor (GR) (Wang and Negishi 2003). There is growing evidence for crosstalk between CAR, PXR, and GR nuclear receptor signaling pathways that regulate cytochrome P450 genes (Kodama et al 2004;Oladimeji et al 2016).…”
Section: Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, no specific PB receptors have been identified, although cytoplasmic receptors for other enzyme-inducing drugs have been described (32). PB increases RNA transcription in rat liver (33) and this increase may account for the observed increases in hepatic microsoma1 enzyme synthesis. Differentiation of 3T3 L-1 cells is accompanied by the accumulation of several new rnRNAs and an increased rate of transcription may be responsible for this (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%