“…At the start of the investigations, 9160 participants with CS were enrolled in the chosen studies; 4719 of them used TA, while 4441 served as controls. 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 Significantly lower SWIs post CS for TA as whole, GCA&D, TIFS, antibiotic powder, ointment, lavage, or injection for the abdominal wound (APOL), and ISD compared with control. The low sample size (less than 100) of eight out of the 39 included studies in this meta‐analysis calls for precaution when analysing the outcomes.…”