2015
DOI: 10.5194/aab-58-211-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of peripheral administration of ghrelin on the performance of growing geese

Abstract: Abstract. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the effect of intraperitoneal (IP) injection of ghrelin on goose performance. Hence, forty-eight 28-day-old geese were assigned into three treatments which lasted 40 days. The first intact group included no injection; that is, treatment 1 was characterized by G0; treatment 2, given to the second intact group, was characterized by G50, 50 ng kg −1 ghrelin body weight (BW); and treatment 3, given to the third intact group, was characterized by G100, 10… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the present findings are in accordance with the results of Tachibana et al (2011), who stated that the administration of ghrelin did not affect feed intake. In a recent study conducted by Höhne et al (2017) on laying hens and also in a study of our research team in geese (Aghdam Shahryar and Lotfi, 2015), peripheral ghrelin administration did not affect energy demands or feed intake at whole growing period or at least finishing rearing-period. It appears that in agreement with Kaiya et al, (2013), only central-/ or endogenous-ghrelin may have a significant effect on appetite (feed intake) regulation in birds, and not exogenous or peripherally-administered ghrelin, especially in finishing rearing-period of chickens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the present findings are in accordance with the results of Tachibana et al (2011), who stated that the administration of ghrelin did not affect feed intake. In a recent study conducted by Höhne et al (2017) on laying hens and also in a study of our research team in geese (Aghdam Shahryar and Lotfi, 2015), peripheral ghrelin administration did not affect energy demands or feed intake at whole growing period or at least finishing rearing-period. It appears that in agreement with Kaiya et al, (2013), only central-/ or endogenous-ghrelin may have a significant effect on appetite (feed intake) regulation in birds, and not exogenous or peripherally-administered ghrelin, especially in finishing rearing-period of chickens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…On the other hand, the effects of peripheral ghrelin administration in poultry species is not completely similar; for example in domestic geese (Anser anser domesticus) results in an increase of feed intake during the growing period (Aghdam Shahryar and Lotfi., 2015), a finding that is in contrast with that of Oclon´ and Pietras, (2011) and Lotfi et al, (2013) in broiler chickens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The production of goose on an industrial basis -requires the introduction of a scientifically based system of breeding, keeping, feeding farm birds, which includes a complex of zootechnical, veterinary and organizational measures that ensure uninterrupted production of eggs, meat, poultry feathers at the lowest cost of manual labor and feed The geese have a high growth rate (Aghdam Shahryar and Lotfi, 2015;Zaplatynsky, 2017;Orishchuk et al, 2017). The live weight of one goose from the one day age to 56-60-day-old age increases by 40-45 times and reaches an average of 4 kg at a cost of 1 kg of weight gain of no more than 3 kg of feed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…на голову; маса яйця -153,2 г; запліднюваність -83,5%; виводимість -71,8%; жива маса гусей в 9-тижневому віці -самці 4,05 кг, самки -3,67 кг; збереженість -87,0%. 2 Вступ У гусівництві України формується м'ясний напрямок, з використанням птиці з генетично обумовленими ознаками: інтенсивним ростом в ранньому віці, здатністю до відгодівлі на жирну печінку, підвищениим виходом пера та пуху прижиттєвої обскубки (Aghdam Shahryar & Lotfi, 2015;Orishchuk et al, 2017). Удосконалення вітчизняного генетичного матеріалу гусей можливе при наявності селекційних програм з використанням ефективних селекційних методів, в тому числі і схрещування.…”
unclassified