2018
DOI: 10.1002/cad.20263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Peer-Group Argumentative Dialogue on Delayed Gains in Scientific Content Knowledge

Abstract: Experimental evidence has shown the effect of peer‐group argumentation on scientific concept development. However, questions regarding how and why it happens remain. The aim of this study is to contribute, with experimental evidence gathered in naturalistic settings (classrooms), to the understanding of the relationship between peer‐group argumentation and content knowledge learning, exploring the role that individual argumentative skills play. In total, sixty‐one fourth‐grade students (aged 9–10 years) partic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
1
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Students who improved their argumentative synthesis writing, considering the integration level of the products, also achieved a significant progress in their socio-scientific knowledge. These results differ from those found by Larraín et al (2018) in a similar study. They conducted an intervention with the goal of contrasting the role of individual argumentative skills in the effect of group argumentation on the learning of scientific content.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Students who improved their argumentative synthesis writing, considering the integration level of the products, also achieved a significant progress in their socio-scientific knowledge. These results differ from those found by Larraín et al (2018) in a similar study. They conducted an intervention with the goal of contrasting the role of individual argumentative skills in the effect of group argumentation on the learning of scientific content.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Students in each lesson were typically presented with a conceptual problem and asked to work in small groups to decide consensually which was the best possible solution, formulating arguments and counter-arguments. The results show that repetitive experiences of peer argumentation had an effect on conceptual learning ( Larrain et al, 2018 ) and that frequency of individual formulation of argumentative moves, particularly counter-argumentation, predicted learning ( Larrain et al, 2018 , 2019 , 2020 ).…”
Section: Deliberative Argumentation and Sustainable Citizenship: Where Is The Evidence?mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the field of argumentation and education, Larrain and colleagues, in Chile (Larrain et al, 2018(Larrain et al, , 2019(Larrain et al, , 2020, conducted a series of quasi-experimental studies in schools to evaluate the effect of peer argumentation on science learning in middleschool students. Resonating with the studies of Howe and colleagues, they also conducted the correlational analysis to account for the differential effect of dialog (argumentative moves) on learning.…”
Section: Deliberative Argumentation and Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strategi pembelajaran Blended Learning yang dikombinasikan dengan peer learning terbukti berhasil memberikan manfaat dan meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar dan kemampuan Groupwork yang dijabarkan dalam 7 aspek yaitu: peningkatan prestasi, munculnya keberagaman pendapat, peningkatan kemampuan berbahasa, peningkatan kemampuan bertanya, rasa bertanggung jawab terhadap kesuksesan seluruh anggota kelompok, dan kemampuan bekerja dalam tim/grup [3]. Pembelajaran Peer Group Learning dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar [4]; [5], selain itu, peer Group Learning dapat mempengaruhi argumentasi siswa [6]; [7].…”
unclassified