2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10683-011-9310-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of payoff tables on experimental oligopoly behavior

Abstract: Abstract:We explore the eects of the provision of an information-processing instrumentpayo tables -on behavior in experimental oligopolies. In one experimental setting, subjects have access to payo tables whereas in the other setting they have not. It turns out that this minor variation in presentation has non-negligible eects on participants' behavior, particularly in the initial phase of the experiment. In the presence of payo tables, subjects tend to be more cooperative.As a consequence, collusive behavior … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That the presentation of monetary rewards alone can substantially affect behavior has been demonstrated in a number of studies (see, e.g., Pruitt 1967, 1970, Selten and Stoecker, 1986, Hannan et al, 2005, Gürerk and Selten, 2012, and Hossain and List, 2012. 4 For example, in a field experiment on an agricultural company, Englmaier et al (2012) observe that a higher salience of incentives for quantity (i.e., the pieceͲrate) tends to increase the total amount of lettuce harvested.…”
Section: Presentation and Experience Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…That the presentation of monetary rewards alone can substantially affect behavior has been demonstrated in a number of studies (see, e.g., Pruitt 1967, 1970, Selten and Stoecker, 1986, Hannan et al, 2005, Gürerk and Selten, 2012, and Hossain and List, 2012. 4 For example, in a field experiment on an agricultural company, Englmaier et al (2012) observe that a higher salience of incentives for quantity (i.e., the pieceͲrate) tends to increase the total amount of lettuce harvested.…”
Section: Presentation and Experience Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The comparison of decomposed games and matrix games adds to the literature on presentation effects (Charness et al, 2004;Requate and Waichman, 2010;Gürerk and Selten, 2011). The comparison of role assignment procedures also complements the studies by Murphy et al (2011) and Kerschbamer (2015a), which discuss how to identify distributional preferences based on sub-jects' choices in several resource allocation tasks but do not discuss the issue of role assignment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is illustrated in Figure 2. Charness et al (2004) and Gürerk and Selten (2012) showed that providing participants with such a comprehensive payoff table is an effective way to systematically reduce complexity. The objective of this extra manipulation was to test in how far participants take others' payoff into account when the complexity of doing so is practically removed.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%