The Effect Of Pay-For-Performance In Hospitals: Lessons For Quality Improvement

Abstract

The payment approach known as "pay-for-performance" has been widely adopted with the aim of improving the quality of health care. Nonetheless, little is known about how to use the approach most effectively to improve care. We examined the effects in 260 hospitals of a pay-for-performance demonstration project carried out by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in partnership with Premier Inc., a nationwide hospital system. We compared these results to those of a control group of 780 hospitals not in the demonstration project. The performance of the hospitals in the project initially improved more than the performance of the control group: More than half of the pay-for-performance hospitals achieved high performance scores, compared to fewer than a third of the control hospitals. However, after five years, the two groups' scores were virtually identical. Improvements were largest among hospitals that were eligible for larger bonuses, were well financed, or operated in less competitive markets. These findings suggest that tailoring pay-for-performance programs to hospitals' specific situations could have the greatest effect on health care quality.

Medicaid Reimbursement and the Quality of Nursing Home Care: A Case Study of Medi-Cal Long-Term Care Reimbursement Act of 2004 in California

“…size of incentive, rules linking performance scores to performance payments) [217][218]. It would be necessary to evaluate its effectiveness for improvement purposes in the future.…”

Desirability and feasibility of wireless electronic monitoring of medications in clinical trials

“…Interest in the use of increasingly sophisticated technology for monitoring MA is not limited to clinical trials. In health care clinical outcomes are increasingly tracked by health care institutions, governments, and payers, and efforts are underway for utilizing outcomes as the basis of payment as part of pay-for-performance [50]. Consistent with the triple aim [51] and health reform [52], as payment hinges increasingly on health outcomes, rather than the volume of service rendered, this technology can be employed with efforts to optimize MA so as to maximize the potential of achieving clinical outcomes, especially for patients exhibiting or at risk for NA.…”

The feasibility of implementing a pay-for-performance program in the treatment of alcohol/drug addiction: Implementation and initial results

“…[4] Another study examining the impact of P4P programs in acute care hospitals found that P4P hospitals were more likely than control group hospitals to achieve high performance scores during the first 5 years of program implementation. [6] Performance scores reflected whether the hospital met or exceeded specified standards of care in treating a number of disease conditions, including pneumonia, heart failure, myocardial infarction, and hip and knee replacements. In addition, the most dramatic improvements in care quality were found in P4P hospitals that operated in less competitive markets, had strong financial performance, and employed large financial incentives.…”