2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of patient choice of intervention on health outcomes

Abstract: Background-Patient preference may influence intervention effects, but has not been extensively studied. Randomized controlled design (N=1075) assessed outcomes when women (60 years +) were given a choice of two formats of a program to enhance heart disease management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the patients' choice and self-evaluation are incorporated, positive treatment effects on motivation, participation, and functional recovery have been found in different patient populations and clinical settings [17][18][19]. Preferably, individualized measures sensitive to varying needs and situations should be included in pain rehabilitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the patients' choice and self-evaluation are incorporated, positive treatment effects on motivation, participation, and functional recovery have been found in different patient populations and clinical settings [17][18][19]. Preferably, individualized measures sensitive to varying needs and situations should be included in pain rehabilitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior publications provide additional details on study design and outcomes of this trial. [16][17][18] All participants were community-dwelling women 60 years of age treated by daily heart medication for a cardiovascular condition (i.e., arrhythmia, angina, myocardial infarction [MI], congestive heart failure [CHF], or valvular disease). Names of potential study participants were generated from patient rosters at clinics in three urban areas in Michigan.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Her research program evaluating individual-level interventions for managing chronic disease employed rigorous and complex designs, including randomized controlled designs (take PRIDE; Clark et al, 1997), preference designs (Clark et al, 2008), and those integrating qualitative and quantitative methodologies (Janz, Clark, & Dodge, 2002). In this issue, in the article titled "Declines With Age in Childhood Asthma Symptoms and Health Care Use: An Adjustment for Evaluations," published shortly after her death, Noreen and her team used mixed effects models with mixture distributions to demonstrate the need to adjust for natural declines in symptoms and health care use with age of children in order to determine true intervention effects when a control group is not possible.…”
Section: Managing Chronic Disease: Individuals At the Center Of Solutmentioning
confidence: 99%