1985
DOI: 10.2527/jas1985.611234x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Passive Immunization Against Somatostatin on Marker Retention Time in Lambs

Abstract: The effects of passive immunization against somatostatin on retention time of marker have been investigated in sheep using Cr2O3 as a marker. The mean transit time for clearance of 50% of the marker was significantly retarded in all the anti-somatostatin-treated animals by approximately 19.0 h, as compared with control lambs given a nonspecific antiserum. The findings suggest an important role for circulating somatostatin in the regulation of the rate of flow of digesta through the gastrointestinal tract in la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Improvements in digesta flow and nutrient utilization in SRIF-immunized animals have been reported in some studies (Fadlalla et al, 1985;Sun et al, 1990). Some evidence for improved food: gain ratios in immunized animals was obtained in the present study but not in immunized animals receiving cimaterol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Improvements in digesta flow and nutrient utilization in SRIF-immunized animals have been reported in some studies (Fadlalla et al, 1985;Sun et al, 1990). Some evidence for improved food: gain ratios in immunized animals was obtained in the present study but not in immunized animals receiving cimaterol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…The lack of response of the basal concentration of GH to SRIF immunization in this study and a number of others (Spencer & Williamson, 1981;Bass et al 1983;Spencer et al 19836;Chaplin, Kerr & Laarveld, 1984) may indicate that the somatomedin and growth re¬ sponses are not necessarily directly related to plasma concentrations of GH. Immunization against SRIF has also been shown to affect the alimentary tract by increasing plasma concentrations of triglycérides in dogs (Schusdziarra, Zyzhar & Rouiller, 1980) and slowing the flow of digesta in sheep (Fadalla, Spencer & Lister, 1985). The effects of SRIF immunization on the alimentary tract may have an indirect effect on growth and IGF-I production by possibly affecting nutritional availability from the gut.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Its mechanisms are as yet undetermined. Immunization against SRIH has been shown to slow gut motility in sheep (Fadalla et al 1985) and it may influence IGF-I synthesis and possibly growth by affecting the availability of nutri¬ ents from the digestive system. Anti-SRIH immunization may also stimulate the secretion of gastrointestinal peptides and as a consequence reduce food intake and liver IGF-I production which is under nutritional control .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%