2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4978084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of particle volume fraction and temperature on the enhancement of thermal conductivity of maghemite (γ–Fe2O3) water-based nanofluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These conductivity measurements can mark as the first available data of maghemite in the literature. In the past, transport properties were measured only about maghemite composites: 10 −7 ‐10 −2 S/m for maghemite‐polyaniline nanocomposites with varying maghemite concentrations and 0.982 W/(mK) for maghemite‐water nanofluids with 2.5 vol% of maghemite …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These conductivity measurements can mark as the first available data of maghemite in the literature. In the past, transport properties were measured only about maghemite composites: 10 −7 ‐10 −2 S/m for maghemite‐polyaniline nanocomposites with varying maghemite concentrations and 0.982 W/(mK) for maghemite‐water nanofluids with 2.5 vol% of maghemite …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…While their magnetic properties are well characterized, their nonmagnetic properties are not. Their thermal conductivities have only been measured in the nanofluid form . Their electrical properties have been measured in the composite form, especially with polyaniline (a conductive polymer) for electromagnetic absorbers, and chemical and biological sensor applications .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 122 ] bold-italicDbold-italicnf=bold-italicDbold-italicLbold1bold−bold-italicψbold1bold+ψ2 where D L is the diffusivity of O 2 in the base fluid (sodium sulphite solution without nanoparticles) which was found by using Wilke and Chang's technique [ 123 ] and ψ is the nanoparticle loading in volume fraction (v/v) and is calculated using the Equation (). [ 124 ] The values of ψ were found to be 3 × 10 −5 , 6 × 10 −5 , 9 × 10 −5 , 1.2 × 10 −4 , 1.5 × 10 −4 , and 1.9 × 10 −4 , corresponding to 017% w/v, 0.034% w/v, 0.051% w/v, 0.068% w/v, 0.085% w/v, and 0.102% w/v, respectively. ψVolume fraction=bold-italicMboldnpbold-italicρboldnpbold-italicMboldnpρnp+Mbfρbf where M np is the mass of the nanoparticles, ρ np is the density of the nanoparticles (5240 kg/m 3 for α‐Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles and 4260 kg/m 3 for TiO 2 nanoparticles), M bf is the mass of the base fluid, and ρ bf is the density of the base fluid.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where D L is the diffusivity of O 2 in the base fluid (sodium sulphite solution without nanoparticles) which was found by using Wilke and Chang's technique [123] and ψ is the nanoparticle loading in volume fraction (v/v) and is calculated using the Equation ( 9). [124] The values of ψ were found to be 3 Â 10 À5 , 6 Â 10 À5 , 9 Â 10 À5 , 1.2 Â 10 À4 , 1.5 Â 10 À4 , and 1.9 Â 10 À4 , corresponding to 017% w/v, 0.034% w/v, 0.051% w/v, 0.068% w/v, 0.085% w/v, and 0.102% w/v, respectively.…”
Section: Pseudo-homogeneous Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%