2015
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2014.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of parasites on sex differences in selection

Abstract: The life history strategies of males and females are often divergent, creating the potential for sex differences in selection. Deleterious mutations may be subject to stronger selection in males, owing to sexual selection, which can improve the mean fitness of females and reduce mutation load in sexual populations. However, sex differences in selection might also maintain sexually antagonistic genetic variation, creating a sexual conflict load. The overall impact of separate sexes on fitness is unclear, but th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, pathogens are also predicted to be a persistent source of selection in sexually dimorphic species (Hamilton ; Hamilton and Zuk ; Hamilton et al. ), and may often differentially impact selection and fitness within each sex (Sharp and Vincent ; discussed in Gipson and Hall ). Key to unravelling the persistence of sexually antagonism under biotic conflict will be the rate ( c vs. Gγ) and direction ( B f , B m ) of male and female optima shifts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, pathogens are also predicted to be a persistent source of selection in sexually dimorphic species (Hamilton ; Hamilton and Zuk ; Hamilton et al. ), and may often differentially impact selection and fitness within each sex (Sharp and Vincent ; discussed in Gipson and Hall ). Key to unravelling the persistence of sexually antagonism under biotic conflict will be the rate ( c vs. Gγ) and direction ( B f , B m ) of male and female optima shifts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the sexes often experience divergent ecological demands (e.g., Shine ; De Lisle and Rowe ; Cooper et al. ; Sharp and Vincent ; Slatkin ) which may be accompanied (or exacerbated) by sex‐specific tradeoffs. For example, typically male‐biased investment in secondary sex traits might result in the male phenotypic mean residing, on average, farther from its viability selection optimum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we used long-term population data on individual variation in parasite load as a measure of condition to investigate the role of sexual selection in promoting local adaptation of males and females, following the approach in some previous studies on parasite-mediated and condition-dependent sexual selection [37,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, field studies on red grouse (Lagopus lagopus) revealed a negative effect of parasite load on body condition and resulted in condition-dependent expression of secondary sexual characters [37]. In laboratory bred populations of D. melanogaster, experimental infection with the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa revealed sex differences in parasite-mediated sexual selection [38]. The aforementioned studies suggest that parasite load can reduce condition, and as a result, influence sexual selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%