1976
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(76)90364-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Pan-Retinal Photocoagulation on Rubeosis Iridis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
30
0
3

Year Published

1979
1979
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical studies show that the destruction of retinal elements by laser or xenon arc photocoagulative treatment results in the regression of untreated disk, retinal, and iris neovascularization (15,17,19). These studies suggest that, under certain conditions, retina can liberate a substance (or substances) capable of inducing intraocular neovascularization .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical studies show that the destruction of retinal elements by laser or xenon arc photocoagulative treatment results in the regression of untreated disk, retinal, and iris neovascularization (15,17,19). These studies suggest that, under certain conditions, retina can liberate a substance (or substances) capable of inducing intraocular neovascularization .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mainstay of therapies, currently panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) and panretinal cryotherapy, are applied in order to prevent the formation of neovascularization especially in the angle region and to achieve regression of vessels that are already present in the anterior (and posterior) chamber [11,12]. Another very radical treatment option is retinal ablation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While previous studies have shown that the early stages of neovasculariza tion can regress after laser treatment, they have dealt predominantly with diabetic eyes, and the number of eyes with central retinal vein occlusion studied in these reports is extremely small [3,[5][6][7][8]. What appears from one of these studies is the finding that eyes with angle closure of greater than 270° tend not to respond to panretinal photocoagula tion [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%