2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of ostensive cues on dogs’ performance in a manipulative social learning task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During domestication, dogs have become selected to maintain attention towards humans, which seems to be critical for dog-human communication and social learning [51]. Thus, it is possible that dogs are predisposed to respond more intensively, or only, to human social cues rather than conspecifics’ ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During domestication, dogs have become selected to maintain attention towards humans, which seems to be critical for dog-human communication and social learning [51]. Thus, it is possible that dogs are predisposed to respond more intensively, or only, to human social cues rather than conspecifics’ ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that highly trained dogs are more proficient in using http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.09.022 0376-6357/© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. human cues than untrained dogs (McKinley and Sambrook, 2000;Range et al, 2009); however, Cunningham and Ramos (2013) obtained no evidence that intensive training improved performance on a cue-following task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Some authors, however, have underlined the importance of the domestication process attributing the domestic dog's sensitivity to human social cues to an human-like social cognition selected during domestication, considering such dog abilities neither simply inherited from wolves nor the result of ontogeny (Hare and Tomasello, 2005;Hare et al, 2010Hare et al, , 2002. Within an approach to socio-cognitive skills in dogs, which demonstrate the importance of selection (natural and artificial) and individual ontogenetic experiences (Miklósi and Topál, 2013;Udell et al, 2010b), a number of studies have assessed the role of learning, living conditions and the quality of the dog-human relationship in shaping the behaviour of dogs in different contexts, such as problem-solving tasks (e.g., Barrera et al, 2011;Bentosela et al, 2009Bentosela et al, , 2008Cunningham and Ramos, 2013;Horn et al, 2013;Marshall-Pescini et al, 2009, 2008Passalacqua et al, 2013;Range et al, 2009;Topál et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent to which a dog can concentrate selectively on specific aspects of the environment and to exclude others is of utmost importance for effective training, social learning, and communication; all of which rely crucially on a dogs’ ability to maintain attention toward humans (Lindsay, 2001; Range et al, 2009a). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%