2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11628-016-0328-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of organizational responses to service failures on customer satisfaction perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Mannaa and Chaudhry (2013) point out, service failures are often impossible to correct, and in such cases, empathy and politeness are crucial factors in retaining the commitment and loyalty of the consumers affected by the service failure. In general, interactional justice (Chen and Lee 2018) or procedural justice (Cheung and To 2017) often serves to compensate for an inadequate level of distributive justice. As Davidow (2003) points out, the perception of justice is influenced most strongly by the following three factors: equality, need and equity.…”
Section: Theory Of Justice and Service Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Mannaa and Chaudhry (2013) point out, service failures are often impossible to correct, and in such cases, empathy and politeness are crucial factors in retaining the commitment and loyalty of the consumers affected by the service failure. In general, interactional justice (Chen and Lee 2018) or procedural justice (Cheung and To 2017) often serves to compensate for an inadequate level of distributive justice. As Davidow (2003) points out, the perception of justice is influenced most strongly by the following three factors: equality, need and equity.…”
Section: Theory Of Justice and Service Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, justice theory is a widely recognized tool to explain the phenomena of recovery satisfaction and its outcomes after service failure (re-patronage intentions) (Chebat & Slusarczyk, 2005;Cheung & To, 2017;Ha & Jang, 2009;McColl-Kennedy et al, 2016;Smith et al, 1999). Service recovery satisfaction is considered a vital antecedent of loyalty.…”
Section: Perceived Service Recovery Justice and Customer Recovery Satisfaction And Re-patronage Intentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Service recovery refers to corrective measures taken by companies to respond to service failures perceived by the customer. Many previous studies have highlighted the importance of subsequent service recovery to establish a positive relationship with the customer (Chao & Cheng, 2019;Cheung & To, 2017;Gustafsson, 2009;Maxham & Netemeyer, 2002a; H. S. Chang & Hsiao, 2008) but no research has measured the orders of the service events in the forms of service recovery justice, recovery satisfaction and customer affection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Customer satisfaction has been acknowledged as the key indicator of successful service recovery (e.g., Balaji, Roy and Quazi, 2017;Cheung and To, 2017;Petzer, De Meyer-Heydenrych and Svensson, 2017;Smith, Bolton and Wagner, 1999;Sparks and McColl-Kennedy, 2001;Tektas, 2017). Previous research conceptualized customer satisfaction into two types, namely, satisfaction with service transaction and cumulative satisfaction (Johnson, Anderson and Fornell, 1995;Johnson et al, 2001).…”
Section: Customer Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%