1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf01016752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of organizational identification on employee affective and performance responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0
5

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
50
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Efraty and Wolfe (1988) found a positive relationship between behavioral work performance and an emotional attachment to an organization. Given that psychological attachment involves bridging individuals and other social members, it will likely promote a positive influence on pro-OBs.…”
Section: Research Model and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Efraty and Wolfe (1988) found a positive relationship between behavioral work performance and an emotional attachment to an organization. Given that psychological attachment involves bridging individuals and other social members, it will likely promote a positive influence on pro-OBs.…”
Section: Research Model and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For example, researchers can empirically distinguish among strong culture organizations (Deal & Kennedy, 1982;Denison & Mishra, 1995, Efraty & Wolfe, 1988Peters & Waterman, 1982) and highperformance teams or "clans" (Katzenbach & Smith, 1993;Lim, 1995;Wilkins & Ouchi, 1983). As organizations increasingly globalize, the existence of strong geographical or functional diff erences can be related to employee outcomes such as commitment and engagement or resistance and sabotage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Indeed, a good deal of empirical evidence supports the relationship between organizational identifi cation and individual behavioral outcomes. Organizational identifi cation has been linked to increased satisfaction (Efraty & Wolfe, 1988), job attitudes and motivation (Lee, 1971), commitment and support (Ashforth & Mael, 1989), performance (Efraty & Wolfe, 1988;Mael & Ashforth, 1995), decision making (Cheney, 1983;Dutton & Dukerich, 1991), and decreased turnover (Mael & Ashforth, 1995). Ashforth and Mael (1989) argue that individual identifi cation aff ects group and organizational outcomes as well, including cohesion, cooperation, altruism, positive evaluations of the group, and loyalty to and pride in the group and its activities.…”
Section: Subcultural Variation and Identifi Cationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An extensive review of the literature on the concept of organizational commitment in the organizational behavior/management literature (e.g., Efraty and Wolfe, 1988) has demonstrated that organizational commitment may result in high job performance, increase in overall organizational effectiveness, and a decrease in employee turnover. Gregson (1992) reviewed organizational commitment studies of accountants and found that many of these studies focus on issues of turnover and relationship between organizational commitment and job satisfaction.…”
Section: Spillover Between Job and Life Satisfacfionmentioning
confidence: 99%