The effect of order of presentation on perception of TAT pictures.

Dollin, Adelaide; Sakoda, James M.

doi:10.1037/h0041925

Cited by 8 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 1 shows t test comparisons of ratings on these scales for Cards 1-10 with 11-20, under each method of administration. Two of the four comparisons for emotional tone and three of four comparisons for outcomes are significant in a direction opposite from that predicted by Dollin and Sakoda (1962). The nonsignificant comparisons show opposite trends; none of the eight comparisons supports their prediction.…”

Section: West Virginia Universitymentioning

confidence: 57%

“…Changing the standard order of TAT administration does not appear warranted on the basis of current evidence. Dollin and Sakoda (1962) have suggested that, as a consequence of the relative sadness of TAT pictures, an adaptation to sadness occurs when TAT cards are administered in standard order. Thus, happier stories should occur to cards seen late in the series.…”

Section: West Virginia Universitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As a means of comparing picture rating with story rating, Dollin and Sakoda (1962) compared the ranks for emotional tone of the 19 cards they used in common with Eron et al (1950), with a resulting rho of .81 for men and .76 for women. A similar comparison of our female subjects with those of Eron et al (1950) yields a rho of .74.…”

Section: West Virginia Universitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effect of order of presentation of TAT cards.

Bernstein¹,

Dana²

1963

Journal of Consulting Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: West Virginia Universitymentioning

confidence: 57%

Section: West Virginia Universitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: West Virginia Universitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effect of order of presentation of TAT cards.

Bernstein¹,

Dana²

1963

Journal of Consulting Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Heim (1955) showed that IQ varied depending upon whether the same type of item was imbedded in easy or hard tests, and that subjects either adapted immediately or in successive stages as function of difficulty level. Dollin and Sakoda (1962) have just shown sequential effects of cards of a certain emotional tone in the Thematic Apperception Test upon the tone attributed to succeeding cards, as suggested by Kelson's stimulus-background formulations.…”

Section: Al Theory and Assumptions In Clinical Testingmentioning

confidence: 85%

A conceptual framework for the clinical test situation.

Block¹

1964

Psychological Bulletin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The need to account for the adaptive behavior of the patient in the clinical test situation is discussed with respect to the relative rather than absolute nature of test responses. Adaptation-level (AL) theory is proposed as a framework of reference for adaptive behavior of the patient in the clinical test situation, as well as for clinical judgment and prediction. The theory of AL possesses the relativity and operational validity required for dealing with complex clinical phenomena. Implications of the AL model for clinical theory, experimentation, and practice are suggested.

show abstract

“…After the two quantitative empirical studies [Gideonse and Sakoda, 1950] 103 and [Lifshitz and Sakoda, 1952], he published on factor analysis [Sakoda, 1952[Sakoda, , 1954[Sakoda, , 1955, and contingency tables [Sakoda and Cohen, 1957]. He authored and co-authored articles on different methodological problems such as the volunteer error in empirical studies on sexual behavior [Maslow and Sakoda, 1952], problems of significance , effects of the order in which pictures are presented [Dollin and Sakoda, 1962]. As a co-author Sakoda contributed to the articles on reinforcement learning [Brand et al, 1956[Brand et al, , 1957a.…”

Section: Computational Social Science In 1950ff: a Well Known Sakoda mentioning

confidence: 99%

Thomas C. Schelling and James M. Sakoda: The Intellectual, Technical, and Social History of a Model

Hegselmann

2017

JASSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The Journal of Mathematical Sociology (JMS) started in 1971. The second issue contained its most cited article: Thomas C. Schelling, "Dynamic Models of Segregation". In that article, Schelling presented a family of models, one of which became a canonical model. To date it is called the Schelling model -an eponym that affixes the inventor's name to the invention, one of the highest forms of scientific recognition. In the very first issue of JMS, James Minoru Sakoda published an article entitled "The Checkerboard Model of Social Interaction". Sakoda's article more or less went unrecognized. Yet, a careful comparison demonstrates that in a certain sense the Schelling model is just an instance of Sakoda's model. A precursor of that model was already part of Sakoda's 1949 dissertation submitted to the University of California at Berkeley. A substantial amount of evidence indicates that in the 1970s Sakoda was well known and recognized as a computational social scientist, whereas Schelling was an unknown in the field. A generation later, the pattern of recognition almost completely reversed: Sakoda had become the unknown, while Schelling was the well-known inventor of the pioneering Schelling model. This article explains this puzzling pattern of recognition. Technical and social factors play a decisive role. Some contrafactual historical reflection suggests that the final result was not inevitable.

show abstract

The effect of order of presentation on perception of TAT pictures.

Cited by 8 publications

References 5 publications

Effect of order of presentation of TAT cards.

Effect of order of presentation of TAT cards.

A conceptual framework for the clinical test situation.

Thomas C. Schelling and James M. Sakoda: The Intellectual, Technical, and Social History of a Model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About