2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of orbital prefrontal cortex lesions on performance on a progressive ratio schedule: implications for models of inter-temporal choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
58
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
19
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This relative increase in perseverative responding is consistent with outcomes stemming from damage to the cerebral cortex, the region most heavily targeted by gestational MeHg exposure (Barone et al, 1998;Berlin et al, 1975;Burbacher et al, 1990;O'Kusky, 1983;Rice, 1983). Lesions within the cortex lead to increases in perseveration on discrimination reversal procedures (Chudasama and Robbins, 2003;Ridley et al, 1993), and they also increase responding on large ratio reinforcement schedules (Kheramin et al, 2005), consistent with MeHg effects reported in Paletz et al, 2006(see Newland et al, 2006a. Cortical regions also appear to mediate behavioral choice (Schultz et al, 2000;Tremblay and Schultz, 1999) in situations like the SDR (and VDR) and concurrent schedules.…”
Section: Mehg and Behavioral Transitionssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…This relative increase in perseverative responding is consistent with outcomes stemming from damage to the cerebral cortex, the region most heavily targeted by gestational MeHg exposure (Barone et al, 1998;Berlin et al, 1975;Burbacher et al, 1990;O'Kusky, 1983;Rice, 1983). Lesions within the cortex lead to increases in perseveration on discrimination reversal procedures (Chudasama and Robbins, 2003;Ridley et al, 1993), and they also increase responding on large ratio reinforcement schedules (Kheramin et al, 2005), consistent with MeHg effects reported in Paletz et al, 2006(see Newland et al, 2006a. Cortical regions also appear to mediate behavioral choice (Schultz et al, 2000;Tremblay and Schultz, 1999) in situations like the SDR (and VDR) and concurrent schedules.…”
Section: Mehg and Behavioral Transitionssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Studies in animal models also suggest an importance of gonadal steroid stimulation for prefrontal cortical function in males. For example, gonadectomy in adult male rats has been shown to significantly impair performance in maze and operant tests of spatial (Daniel et al, 2003;Kritzer et al, 2007;Kritzer et al, 2001) and non-spatial (Ceccarelli et al, 2001) working memory and behavioral flexibility (Kritzer et al, 2007), which are processes that are dependent on the medial prefrontal cortices (Dias and Aggleton, 2000;Kesner et al, 1996;Lacroix et al, 2002;Schwabe et al, 2004;Taylor et al, 2003), as well as performance on a progressive reward ratio task (Kritzer et al, 2007) which is sensitive to lesions of the orbital prefrontal cortices (Kheramin et al, 2005). In this study, analyses of hormone sensitivity were extended to a task sensitive in part to lesions of the perirhinal prefrontal cortices, a spontaneous novel object recognition (NOR) task, to test the hypothesis that functions mediated by this third major division of the prefrontal cortex may also be sensitive to long-term gonadectomy and hormone replacement in adult male subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematical principles of reinforcement (MPR; Killeen, 1994;Killeen & Sitomer, 2003) characterizes response rates on various schedules of reinforcement as a function of three parameters: memory decay rate (λ), motivation (a), and motor ability (δ). MPR has been applied previously in behavioral neuroscience research, to analyze the effects of brain lesions or drugs (Kheramin, Body, Herrera, Bradshaw, Szabadi, Deakin, & Anderson, 2005;Reilly, 2003). At the conclusion of this phase, the influence of chronic stress on spatial memory was assessed using a hippocampaldependent, spatial recognition Y maze.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%