1949
DOI: 10.1128/jb.58.3.279-289.1949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Orally Administered Streptomycin and Sulfathalidine Upon the Bacterial Flora of the Colon

Abstract: Temple University School of Medicine in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Proctology).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1950
1950
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the 1950s and 1960s, varying oral antibiotics and varying mechanical preparations were used following the apparent failure of the sulfa compounds that were used. The aminoglycoside antibiotics of streptomycin [ 62 ], neomycin [ 63 ], and kanamycin [ 64 ] were evaluated because of their broad activity against colonic gram negative bacteria and because they are not absorbed from the gut. The role of anaerobes in infections following colonic contamination was not fully appreciated at this time, and Poth believed that disrupting the anaerobic environment of the colonic lumen was sufficient without specific antimicrobial coverage [ 8 ].…”
Section: Prevention Of Ssis In Elective Colon Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 1950s and 1960s, varying oral antibiotics and varying mechanical preparations were used following the apparent failure of the sulfa compounds that were used. The aminoglycoside antibiotics of streptomycin [ 62 ], neomycin [ 63 ], and kanamycin [ 64 ] were evaluated because of their broad activity against colonic gram negative bacteria and because they are not absorbed from the gut. The role of anaerobes in infections following colonic contamination was not fully appreciated at this time, and Poth believed that disrupting the anaerobic environment of the colonic lumen was sufficient without specific antimicrobial coverage [ 8 ].…”
Section: Prevention Of Ssis In Elective Colon Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest concentration of aureomycin used in their studies was 0.1 mg/ml, and it is only at higher levels of antibiotic concentration that the stimulatory effect of aureomycin becomes apparent. Furthermore, the role played by mere competition by bacteria for nutritive substrate cannot be of major importance since a number of studies of the effect of antibiotics on the intestinal flora indicate that the change is qualitative rather than quantitative; in fact the total bacterial count after continued antibiotic therapy frequently exceeds that existing before the administration of the drugs (Bierman and Jawetz, 1951;Dearing and Heilman, 1950;Lipman et al, 1946;Marshall et al, 1950;Metzger and Shapse, 1950;Spaulding et al, 1949).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%