2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2014.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of nutritional and fermentational characteristics of grass and legume silages on feed intake, growth performance and blood indices of lambs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
13
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
13
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Przemyslaw et al . () recorded a lower intake of RC silage (44·1 g DM kg −1 metabolic weight), but this may have been due to the fact that the lambs in their study received twice the amount barley as was fed to lambs in our study, and the lambs also differed in age. Our results thus confirm those of Speijers et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, Przemyslaw et al . () recorded a lower intake of RC silage (44·1 g DM kg −1 metabolic weight), but this may have been due to the fact that the lambs in their study received twice the amount barley as was fed to lambs in our study, and the lambs also differed in age. Our results thus confirm those of Speijers et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The pure legume mixture RC‐SF had the highest CP and lowest NDF contents, in addition to the highest lactic acid and lowest soluble N concentrations, which is consistent with it having numerically the highest intakes. Several studies have been carried out on intake of red clover, but few experiments have studied the feeding of red clover silage to growing lambs (Fraser et al ., ; Speijers et al ., ; Marley et al ., ; Przemyslaw et al ., ). Those experiments in which RC and other legumes were compared with grass silages over several weeks generally showed higher intakes of legumes, and notably of RC than of grass silage (Speijers et al ., ; Marley et al ., ), and our results confirm these observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations