The Effect of Nursing Leadership on Hospital Nurses?? Professional Practice Behaviors

Manojlovich, Milisa

doi:10.1097/00005110-200507000-00009

Cited by 45 publications

(58 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Also, McCormick and Tanguma reported high mean score for overall leadership selfefficacy score [23]. In this context, Manojlovich highlighted that, unitlevel nurse leaders who feel more efficacious in their nursing leadership roles not only have access to more power for themselves, but also provide more access to power for their staff and empower them [1].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Relationship between Leadership Self-Efficacy and Leadership Effectiveness of First-Line Nurse Managers

Abou¹

2017

Arts Social Sci J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Today, nursing leaders face unprecedented challenges as healthcare organizations struggle to adapt to ever-accelerating rates of change both internally with the external environment in which they are embedded. The connection between leadership self-efficacy and leadership effectiveness may be critical to find new ways of selecting and developing leadership in healthcare organizations. Greater understanding is needed regarding how leaders' efficacy beliefs interact with their broader self-concept and effectiveness to increase the adaptability across numerous challenges, roles, and performance contexts.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The professional practices of staff nurses may depend in part on first-line nurse managers' ability to provide an environment more conducive to professional practice [1]. First-line nurse manager is described as the pivotal point in health care delivery system [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationship between Leadership Self-Efficacy and Leadership Effectiveness of First-Line Nurse Managers

Abou¹

2017

Arts Social Sci J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Their inclusion facilitated improved critical decision-making during handover. Such leadership from senior health professionals, as acknowledged by respondents, is essential for driving change and in improving team performance (Kassean & Jagoo 2005, Manojlovich 2005, Risk perceptions identified through respondents' comprehensive descriptions of adverse events indicate a safety-conscious workforce, which was aware of the potentially negative impact of poor handover on patients. In view of these findings, it is anticipated that a high level of vigilance and compliance exists with handover protocols by health professionals.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perspectives of clinical handover processes: a multi‐site survey across different health professionals

Manias

Geddes

Watson

et al. 2015

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims and objectives. To examine the perspectives of health professionals of different disciplines about clinical handover. Background. Ineffective handovers can cause major problems relating to the lack of delivery of appropriate care. Design. A prospective, cross-sectional design was conducted using a survey about clinical handover practices. Methods. Health professionals employed in public metropolitan hospitals, public rural hospitals and community health centres were involved. The sample comprised doctors, nurses and allied health professionals, including physiotherapists, social workers, pharmacists, dieticians and midwives employed in Western Aus-tralia, New South Wales, South Australia and the Australian Capital Territory. The survey sought information about health professionals' experiences about clinical handover; their perceived effectiveness of clinical handover; involvement of patients and family members; health professionals' ability to confirm understanding and to clarify clinical information; role modelling behaviour of health professionals ; training needs; adverse events encountered and possibilities for improvements. Results. In all, 707 health professionals participated (response rate = 14%). Represented professions were nursing (60%), medicine (22%) and allied health (18%). Many health professionals reported being aware of adverse events where they noticed poor handover was a significant cause. Differences existed between health professions in terms of how effectively they gave handover, perceived effectiveness of bedside handover vs. nonbedside handover, patient and family involvement in handover, respondents' confirmation of understanding handover from their perspective, their observation of senior health professionals giving feedback to junior health professionals, awareness of adverse events and severity of adverse events relating to poor handovers. What does this study contribute to the wider global clinical community? • No previous published survey research has involved an exploration of perceptions and experiences of health professionals of multiple disciplines in relation to clinical handover. In this exploratory study, we examined the perceptions and experiences of health professionals of different disciplines about clinical handover, comprising doctors, nurses and allied health professionals, including physiotherapists , social workers, dieticians, pharmacists and midwives. • Despite extensive measures available worldwide aimed at improving clinical handover processes, participating health professionals experienced adverse events relating to clinical handover in seven areas. These were: delays in treatment or procedure, or, prolonged treatment or procedure; lack of monitoring information given on clinical assessment, leading to patient deterioration; errors involving medications; patient falls; disruptive, aggressive behaviour and confused state leading to injury; putting patients at risk of infection and putting infants at risk. Greater levels of innovation are needed in training a...

show abstract

“…11,[15][16][17][18][19] Diğer yandan, dünya genelinde hemşirelik hizmetleri yöneti-minde uygulanan liderlik stillerinde herhangi bir standardizasyon geliştirilmemiştir. Genel olarak hemşirelik hizmetleri yönetiminde kullanılan liderlik stilleri arasında otokratik, demokratik-katı-lımcı ve tam-serbesti tanıyan liderlik stillerinin yanı sıra görev odaklı liderlik yaklaşımlarından biri olan etkileşimci liderlik stili de yer almaktadır.…”

Section: Hemşi̇reli̇k Hi̇zmetleri̇ Yöneti̇mi̇nde Li̇derli̇k Ve Kullanilan Li̇dunclassified

The Lock Point of Patient Care Outcomes: Leader of Nursing Service Management: Review

Akbıyık¹,

Korhan²

2017

Turkiye Klinikleri J Nurs Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Effect of Nursing Leadership on Hospital Nurses?? Professional Practice Behaviors

Cited by 45 publications

References 17 publications

Relationship between Leadership Self-Efficacy and Leadership Effectiveness of First-Line Nurse Managers

Relationship between Leadership Self-Efficacy and Leadership Effectiveness of First-Line Nurse Managers

Perspectives of clinical handover processes: a multi‐site survey across different health professionals

The Lock Point of Patient Care Outcomes: Leader of Nursing Service Management: Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About