2008 American Control Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2008.4586900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of nonminimum-phase zero locations on the performance of feedforward model-inverse control techniques in discrete-time systems

Abstract: Abstract-Noncollocated sensors and actuators, and/or fast sample rates with plants having high relative degree, can lead to nonminimum-phase (NMP) discrete-time zero dynamics that complicate the control system design. In this paper, we examine three stable approximate model-inverse feedforward control techniques, the nonmimimum-phase zeros ignore (NPZIgnore), the zero-phase-error tracking controller (ZPETC) and the zero-magnitude-error tracking controller (ZMETC), which have frequently been used for NMP system… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous work [17], three different model-inverse techniques [18] were tried: the non-minimum-phase zeros ignore (NPZ-Ignore), the zero-phase-error tracking controller (ZPETC), and the zero-magnitude-error tracking controller (ZMETC). These worked well when controlling a linear plant model, but performed worse than the baseline controller alone when simulated in FAST.…”
Section: Gain-scheduled Model-inverse Feedforward Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous work [17], three different model-inverse techniques [18] were tried: the non-minimum-phase zeros ignore (NPZ-Ignore), the zero-phase-error tracking controller (ZPETC), and the zero-magnitude-error tracking controller (ZMETC). These worked well when controlling a linear plant model, but performed worse than the baseline controller alone when simulated in FAST.…”
Section: Gain-scheduled Model-inverse Feedforward Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the desired feedforward controller, the transfer function G T should be inverted. In case the system is non-minimum phase, a zero-magnitude-error tracking controller stable inversion technique is used 28 to compute a stable inverse.…”
Section: Model-based Feedforward Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore a stable modelinverse approximation is used instead. Three different model-inverse techniques (Butterworth et al [16]) are used: the nonminimum-phase zeros ignore (NPZ-Ignore), the zero-phase-error tracking controller (ZPETC), and the zero-magnitude-error tracking controller (ZMETC). Figure 8), even without any gain scheduling or low-pass filtering.…”
Section: • Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%