2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of non-standard heat treatment of sheep’s milk on physico-chemical properties, sensory characteristics, and the bacterial viability of classical and probiotic yogurt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…e LAB microbiota seemed not to be in uenced by the presence of yeast since the number of LAB was not signi cantly changed during the incubation of contaminated and not-contaminated yogurt (Table 1). e LAB number during the conduction of the experiment was in the range of 5.5-7.2 log•CFU/cm 3 in all samples which is in accordance with number of lactic acid bacteria normally present during the storage of the yogurt [22]. Also, the pH values in the samples were generally unchanged during the period of the experiment, ranking 4.2-4.3 which is in compliance with the literature [22].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e LAB microbiota seemed not to be in uenced by the presence of yeast since the number of LAB was not signi cantly changed during the incubation of contaminated and not-contaminated yogurt (Table 1). e LAB number during the conduction of the experiment was in the range of 5.5-7.2 log•CFU/cm 3 in all samples which is in accordance with number of lactic acid bacteria normally present during the storage of the yogurt [22]. Also, the pH values in the samples were generally unchanged during the period of the experiment, ranking 4.2-4.3 which is in compliance with the literature [22].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…e LAB number during the conduction of the experiment was in the range of 5.5-7.2 log•CFU/cm 3 in all samples which is in accordance with number of lactic acid bacteria normally present during the storage of the yogurt [22]. Also, the pH values in the samples were generally unchanged during the period of the experiment, ranking 4.2-4.3 which is in compliance with the literature [22]. e concentration of CO 2 in the headspace of a package at the beginning of measurement was 1.9-3.6% (Table 1), which is much higher than the atmospheric concentration of 0.03% CO 2 probably because of the establishing of equilibrium with the product itself.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The difference in the values of pH for UHT treated and retort processed samples could be due to the use of different temperatures for the treatment of porridge samples. The fact that higher processing temperatures can lead to a higher pH was also established by Zamberlin and Samaržija () for different heat treatments given to sheep's milk.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Appropriate application of these tests allows product characterization and consumer preferences to be assessed (Drake, 2007). Many studies have investigated the impact of different heat treatments on the sensory properties of milk and dairy products (Jo et al, 2018;Li et al, 2018;Ul Haq et al, 2014;Zamberlin and Samaržija, 2017). Heat treatments can, for example, damage the flavor and/or texture of milk, as reported by Israr ul Haq et al (2014) on skimmed buffalo milk.…”
Section: Sensory Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%