1986
DOI: 10.1080/00949658608810890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of non-normality on the use of the range in estimating the population standard deviation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Study participants' mean age was between 44 and 66 years across studies, and most were female. Body mass index was presented in only 4 of the studies (mean, 34 [range, [31][32][33][34][35][36][37]). Participants generally had poor glycemic control by current treatment standards.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Study participants' mean age was between 44 and 66 years across studies, and most were female. Body mass index was presented in only 4 of the studies (mean, 34 [range, [31][32][33][34][35][36][37]). Participants generally had poor glycemic control by current treatment standards.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If only the range was given as the measure of variation, then standard deviation was estimated as the range divided by 5.88 (99.7% confidence interval [CI] assuming a normal distribution). 32 If the interquartile range was given, standard deviation was estimated. 33 Pooled effects of the RCTs were determined with each study weighted by the inverse of the study variance, using a random effects model with the DerSimonian and Laird formula for calculating between-study variance.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%