2024
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of negative pressure wound therapy on the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers: A meta‐analysis

Ning Zhang,
Yibin Liu,
Weiqi Yan
et al.

Abstract: Negative pressure injury is one of the auxiliary methods of treating diabetes foot ulcers. It has been shown to be superior to conventional techniques in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Nevertheless, the results of observational research are still scarce. A systematic review of RCTs and observations was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness and security of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) treatment for diabetes foot ulcers. Three English e‐databases have been found for NPWT research. The meta‐an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the current clinical diagnosis and treatment of DFU also face challenges, with the clinical diagnosis of DFU being overly dependent on the clinical experience of clinicians and lacking effective treatments ( Armstrong et al, 2017 ; Matos et al, 2018 ; Purwanti et al, 2024 ; Wang F. et al, 2024 ; Wang K. et al, 2024 ). At the present stage, the treatment of DFU patients mainly includes debridement, wound dressing, anti-infection treatment, peripheral vasculopathy treatment, strict glycemic control, and amputation ( McIllhatton et al, 2021 ; Orlando et al, 2021 ; Ahmed et al, 2022 ; Slomski, 2022 ; Jeffcoate et al, 2024 ), but the therapeutic efficacy of these methods is still unsatisfactory and has not yet achieved a satisfactory clinical results, that is, they do not fully control the underlying metabolic lesions ( Bardill et al, 2022 ; Chen et al, 2024 ; Yi et al, 2024 ; Zhang G. et al, 2024 ; Zhang N. et al, 2024 ). Thus, it is urgent to further identify novel biomarkers of DFU to improve the current dilemma of clinical diagnosis and treatment of DFU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the current clinical diagnosis and treatment of DFU also face challenges, with the clinical diagnosis of DFU being overly dependent on the clinical experience of clinicians and lacking effective treatments ( Armstrong et al, 2017 ; Matos et al, 2018 ; Purwanti et al, 2024 ; Wang F. et al, 2024 ; Wang K. et al, 2024 ). At the present stage, the treatment of DFU patients mainly includes debridement, wound dressing, anti-infection treatment, peripheral vasculopathy treatment, strict glycemic control, and amputation ( McIllhatton et al, 2021 ; Orlando et al, 2021 ; Ahmed et al, 2022 ; Slomski, 2022 ; Jeffcoate et al, 2024 ), but the therapeutic efficacy of these methods is still unsatisfactory and has not yet achieved a satisfactory clinical results, that is, they do not fully control the underlying metabolic lesions ( Bardill et al, 2022 ; Chen et al, 2024 ; Yi et al, 2024 ; Zhang G. et al, 2024 ; Zhang N. et al, 2024 ). Thus, it is urgent to further identify novel biomarkers of DFU to improve the current dilemma of clinical diagnosis and treatment of DFU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%