2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12951-015-0075-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of nanoparticle size on the probability to cross the blood-brain barrier: an in-vitro endothelial cell model

Abstract: BackgroundDuring the last decade nanoparticles have gained attention as promising drug delivery agents that can transport through the blood brain barrier. Recently, several studies have demonstrated that specifically targeted nanoparticles which carry a large payload of therapeutic agents can effectively enhance therapeutic agent delivery to the brain. However, it is difficult to draw definite design principles across these studies, owing to the differences in material, size, shape and targeting agents of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
84
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…L-DTX was found to maintain 100% more drug concentration in brain at 4 h as compared to the marketed formulation. The size ranges of nanocarriers should be from 40 nm to 200 nm, for a successful brain delivery of a drug (Jain , 2012;Masserini , 2013;Mukherjee et al, 2015;Sonali et al, 2016a;Shilo et al, 2015). The vesicle size in this work was below 50 nm, hence the experimental formulation might improve the drug delivery by virtue of its nanosize (Sonali et al, 2016a;Shilo et al, 2015;Jain , 2012;Masserini , 2013;Mukherjee et al, 2015) and highly lipidic in nature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…L-DTX was found to maintain 100% more drug concentration in brain at 4 h as compared to the marketed formulation. The size ranges of nanocarriers should be from 40 nm to 200 nm, for a successful brain delivery of a drug (Jain , 2012;Masserini , 2013;Mukherjee et al, 2015;Sonali et al, 2016a;Shilo et al, 2015). The vesicle size in this work was below 50 nm, hence the experimental formulation might improve the drug delivery by virtue of its nanosize (Sonali et al, 2016a;Shilo et al, 2015;Jain , 2012;Masserini , 2013;Mukherjee et al, 2015) and highly lipidic in nature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Action potential is the signal of communication between neurons. This is the leading premise of all experiments made in the field of Photostimulation [12,14].…”
Section: Photostimulation and Qdsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This is a very promising technique, mostly because of its non-invasive properties, which do not include any genetically or chemical manipulation. It is proven that optically excited QDs can perturb the electrochemical equilibrium of a cell membrane [12]. Aß aggregates in AD induce the process of depolarization of the cell membrane [9].…”
Section: Photostimulation and Qdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The BBB is a passive largely impermeable cellular barrier that is composed of endothelial cells, pericytes and astrocytes that separates the blood from brain 111 interstitial fluid. The size 276 and surface charge 277 of NPs have been shown to affect their passage through the BBB. Unfortunately, even after optimization, the transport efficacy is still low 278 as the nanoparticles must first be internalized by the endothelial cells followed by intracellular transport and export for uptake by neighboring neural cells.…”
Section: Magnetic Nanoparticles For Crossing the Blood Brain Barriermentioning
confidence: 99%