The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2008.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of motivation on working memory: An fMRI and SEM study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A common paradigm used in neuroimaging [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], the 0-back task was used as a measure of vigilance and to keep participants in an approximately similar state of arousal. The tones used to elicit a binaural beat were played through a pair of stereo headphones positioned so the earpieces and headband did not press against electrodes and were stable while participants engaged in the vigilance task.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common paradigm used in neuroimaging [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], the 0-back task was used as a measure of vigilance and to keep participants in an approximately similar state of arousal. The tones used to elicit a binaural beat were played through a pair of stereo headphones positioned so the earpieces and headband did not press against electrodes and were stable while participants engaged in the vigilance task.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significant role played by the left cingulum bundle in mediating the response to motivators (monetary incentives, in particular) has been clearly demonstrated (Akitsuki et al, 2003;Bush et al, 2000Bush et al, , 2002Clark et al, 2009;Fujiwara et al, 2009;Nieuwenhuis et al, 2005;Pessoa, 2009;Simoes-Franklin et al, 2009), in addition to its function in maintaining a sustained response to PM task demands (Reynolds et al, 2009). Similarly, the function of the orbital frontal in motivated behavior is wellknown (Elliott et al, 2003;Rolls, 2004) and includes more recent findings, which extend the orbital frontal's function to the top-down modulation of cognitive control processes in response to changes in motivational status Gilbert and Fiez, 2004;Krawczyk et al, 2007;Pochon et al, 2002;Szatkowska et al, 2008). Our results are consistent with previous research demonstrating the greater role of the left relative to the right orbital frontal white matter in mediating positive or reward-related affect and emotion-related learning (Eddington et al, 2009;O'Doherty et al, 2001;Ogai et al, 2005;Schutter and van Honk, 2006;Thut et al, 1997;Tranel et al, 2002;Wang et al, 2005) and is also consistent with others who have reported activation of the anterior cingulate and orbital frontal in response to positive reward (Linke et al, 2010) or anticipation of reward Risinger et al, 2005), especially when reward was in the form of a monetary incentive (Kirsch et al, 2003;Staudinger et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Current modeling techniques show that current flows below the PFC sites, but it also reaches orbitofrontal and ventral temporal regions (Brunoni et al, 2014; Truong, Magerowski, Blackburn, Bikson, & Alonso-Alonso, 2013). Orbitofrontal regions contribute to motivational engagement and performance (Arana et al, 2003; Klein-Flugge, Barron, Brodersen, Dolan, & Behrens, 2013; Szatkowska, Bogorodzki, Wolak, Marchewka, & Szeszkowski, 2008; Tobler, O’Doherty, Dolan, & Schultz, 2007). However, if anodal tDCS is indirectly, through PFC connections, affecting subcortical regions involved in WM and reward, such as the basal ganglia, then this may explain some of the behavioral effects we find in our current and previous tDCS experiments.…”
Section: 2 the Mechanism Of Tdcs Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%