2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(01)00304-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of monaural middle ear destruction on postnatal development of auditory response properties of mouse inferior collicular neurons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Killackey and Ryugo [1977] reported that the laminated structure of the central nucleus of the IC of the rat is altered following unilateral but not bilateral ear canal closure. Their findings are supported by studies of Xu and Jen [2001] who report lack of a clear tonotopic organization of the IC of juvenile mice studied after middle ear destruction performed at 12-14 days after birth.…”
Section: Central Effects Of Unilateral Chlsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Killackey and Ryugo [1977] reported that the laminated structure of the central nucleus of the IC of the rat is altered following unilateral but not bilateral ear canal closure. Their findings are supported by studies of Xu and Jen [2001] who report lack of a clear tonotopic organization of the IC of juvenile mice studied after middle ear destruction performed at 12-14 days after birth.…”
Section: Central Effects Of Unilateral Chlsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The bilateral response to unilateral manipulation was also observed in our measurements of dendritic fields following unilateral CHL, where we identified an increase in dendritic length in both medial and lateral fields on both sides of the brain [Tucci et al, 2001]. Xu and Jen [2001] examined auditory response properties in IC neurons of juvenile and adult mice following unilateral middle ear destruction, producing permanent unilateral CHL. In animals of both age groups, units in the IC contralateral to the manipulated CHL ear were found to exhibit longer latencies, higher minimum thresholds, a smaller dynamic range, and degraded tuning curves compared to cells in the opposite IC, or in control animals.…”
Section: Central Effects Of Unilateral Chlsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The hearing impairments investigated in previous studies (e.g. Popelar et al, 1994;Salvi et al, 2000;Syka, 2002;Wang et al, 2002;Barsz et al, 2007;Izquierdo et al, 2008;Sun et al, 2008) employed either interventions into the mature system to explore plasticity in adulthood (Wang et al, 1996(Wang et al, , 2002Rajan, 1998;Salvi et al, 2000;Barsz et al, 2007;Sun et al, 2008) or permanent destruction of a certain part of the auditory pathway before the onset of hearing to explore hearing-impairment-induced developmental anomalies (Kitzes & Semple, 1985;McAlpine et al, 1997;Shepherd et al, 1999;Xu & Jen, 2001;Vale et al, 2004;Kotak et al, 2005;Kral et al, 2005). However, to correctly identify the developmental changes induced by a hearing impairment, even the second method may be inadequate: the permanent nature of the impairment (e.g.…”
Section: Effect Of Hearing Impairment On the Representation Of Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4), reflecting the total activity of ascending inputs to the IC (Nudo and Masterton, 1986;Brown et al, 1997), the nature of the outputs from that IC may be quite different in each condition. Given that unilateral CA eliminates information derived from one ear, while unilateral CHL only diminishes its central representation, CHL animals likely maintain some level of inhibition in the IC ipsilateral to the intact ear (Xu and Jen, 2001) while in CA animals the IC units have become more "excitable". Therefore, it would follow that the level of excitation present in the projection from the IC contralateral to the manipulated ear to the MG would be higher in CA animals than in CHL animals, affecting the activity in thalamocotical projections to auditory cortex, and the level of 2-DG uptake in auditory cortex.…”
Section: Sub-cortical Effects Of Unilateral Hearing Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrophysiological investigations of conductive hearing loss (CHL) in animals have shown that CHL changes the way sound is processed in the peripheral and central auditory system (e.g., Clopton and Silverman, 1978;Webster and Bobbin, 1986;Sumner et al, 2005;Xu and Jen, 2001;Jen and Xu, 2002;Xu et al, 2007). Centrally, unilateral CHL results in a decrease in glucose uptake as measured by the 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) method, affecting cellular activity and metabolism in the major afferent projection from the manipulated ear (e.g., Tucci et al, 1999Tucci et al, , 2001.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%