2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020ef001640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Modeling Strategies on Assessments of Differential Warming Impacts of 0.5°C

Abstract: • Globally aggregated, the avoided impact of climate extremes by 0.5°C less warming is qualitatively consistent among modeling strategies • Regionally, model-setup dependency is large in northern high latitudes for hot/cold extremes, and scattered globally for wet/dry extremes • Different reginal responses among model setups are dominated by transient vs. quasiequilibrium responses, prescribed SSTs, and aerosols Accepted Article This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, in the latter decades (2001-2020), a significant increasing trend of surface temperature was revealed in R-1, R-3, and R-4 at the rate of 0.6 • C, 0.8 • C, and 0.9 • C/year, respectively. Results of this study further support the findings of previous studies [52,[66][67][68], which described a significant decline in precipitation (10 to 15 mm/year), while the incline in air temperature (0.6 to 0.9 • C) detected drought/dry conditions in utmost parts of the study region. The temporal trend of PET observed an increasing pattern over many regions of SA except R-1, with higher intensity during 1981-2000 and severe extreme intensity during the period 2000-2020 (Figure 7q-t).…”
Section: Scpdsi Possible Linkages With Different Climate Factors and ...supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Interestingly, in the latter decades (2001-2020), a significant increasing trend of surface temperature was revealed in R-1, R-3, and R-4 at the rate of 0.6 • C, 0.8 • C, and 0.9 • C/year, respectively. Results of this study further support the findings of previous studies [52,[66][67][68], which described a significant decline in precipitation (10 to 15 mm/year), while the incline in air temperature (0.6 to 0.9 • C) detected drought/dry conditions in utmost parts of the study region. The temporal trend of PET observed an increasing pattern over many regions of SA except R-1, with higher intensity during 1981-2000 and severe extreme intensity during the period 2000-2020 (Figure 7q-t).…”
Section: Scpdsi Possible Linkages With Different Climate Factors and ...supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The synergy combining the CESM large ensemble runs and the CESM low-warming runs provides an ideal framework to investigate the differences between transient and stabilized scenarios. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission pathways and aerosol forcing both differ among the two different scenarios (Sanderson et al, 2017;Zhang & Zhou, 2021), other aspects of CESM being identical. Both experiments contain 11 ensemble members with different initial conditions.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission pathways and aerosol forcing both differ among the two different scenarios (Sanderson et al, 2017;Zhang and Zhou, 2021), other aspects of CESM being identical. Both experiments contain 11 ensemble members with different initial conditions.…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the effect of warming levels on the frequency of heatwaves and population exposure, the 1.5 °C, 2 °C, and 3 °C warming periods are derived. According to the evolution of global mean near-surface air temperature with an 11-year running window of CESM1 historical and RCP8.5 simulations 65 , the timing of 1.5 °C, 2 °C and 3 °C warming relative to the preindustrial level (1850–1920) is 2029 (2024–2034), 2041 (2036–2046) and 2060 (2055–2065), respectively. The frequency of the 1.5 °C warming world is an average of 11 years during the warming period and the same for the 2 °C and 3 °C warming worlds, while the population exposure of the 1.5 °C, 2 °C and 3 °C warming worlds are estimated using the 2030 s, 2040 s, and 2060 s population exposures to heatwave, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%