2024
DOI: 10.1057/s41288-024-00325-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of microinsurance on the financial resilience of low-income households in Ghana: evidence from a propensity score matching analysis

Emmanuel Owusu Oppong,
Baorong Yu,
Bruvine Orchidée Mazonga Mfoutou
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Difference-in-Differences (DID) provides a valuable quasi-experimental approach for estimating the Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATET) (Oppong, 2022). This is achieved by comparing changes over time in outcomes such as ROA, ROE, and profit, between the control group (non-adopters) and treatment group (adopters) (Angrist & Pischke, 2010;Oppong et al, 2024b), effectively controlling for any unobservable time and group characteristics that may impact the treatment effect on the outcome (Bertrand et al, 2004).…”
Section: Difference In Difference Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Difference-in-Differences (DID) provides a valuable quasi-experimental approach for estimating the Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATET) (Oppong, 2022). This is achieved by comparing changes over time in outcomes such as ROA, ROE, and profit, between the control group (non-adopters) and treatment group (adopters) (Angrist & Pischke, 2010;Oppong et al, 2024b), effectively controlling for any unobservable time and group characteristics that may impact the treatment effect on the outcome (Bertrand et al, 2004).…”
Section: Difference In Difference Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, following the work of (Oppong, Yu, and Mazonga Mfoutou, 2024b), we estimated the Average Treatment Untreated (ATU) effect for our three profitability proxies. We find that the effect of social media adoption on the untreated groups is less compared to the treated groups.…”
Section: Average Treatment Effect Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%