2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.omsc.2019.100112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of maxillary-mandibular advancement surgery on two-dimensional cephalometric analysis, polysomnographic and patient-reported outcomes in 32 patients with sleep disordered breathing: A retrospective cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2011 ; Van der Cruyssen et al. 2019 ). Although clinical reports on the improvement of critical pressure are somewhat sparse, the observed improvement in our model is in good agreement with the widely reported high success rate (Zaghi et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2011 ; Van der Cruyssen et al. 2019 ). Although clinical reports on the improvement of critical pressure are somewhat sparse, the observed improvement in our model is in good agreement with the widely reported high success rate (Zaghi et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results illustrate an effect size that is big enough to show significance. The heart rate reduction of 5.9 beats/min was inferior to Lin's 8.7 beats/min 6 months after maxillary-mandibular advancement [45] but better than Sumi's 4.5 beats/min after 3-to 4-day use of nasal CPAP [11], Mayer's 3.4 beats/minute after 6 months of nasal CPAP therapy [37], de Paula Soares's 2.4 beats/min 6 to 9 months after lateral pharyngoplasty [46], and those reporting no change in mean heart rate after their treatments (e.g., see [47][48][49], including Van der Cruyssen's patients after maxillary-mandibular advancement [49]). Because the lack of detailed information in the literature made statistical analysis impossible, this was just the order of the mean heart rate reductions (so as to enable the AHI comparisons below).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, examining threedimensional (3D) complex structures with twodimensional (2D) systems has limitations. These studies' findings have limited to linear measurements of sagittal or transverse aspects and cannot accurately represent the morphology of the airway space or the compromised areas leading to breathing disorders (6,7). Conventional computed tomography (CT) systems often overcome these limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%