Abstract:The existing literature finds that mandatory environmental regulation (MER) can significantly reduce environmental pollution. However, much less is known about how the implementation of MER affects green development efficiency (GDE). Based on the Air Pollution Control Action Plan which was enforced in 2013 in China’s most developed regions as an exogenous shock, we find that first, MER has a significant negative effect on the improvement of GDE by reducing regional scale efficiency. Second, MER mainly reduces … Show more
“…The “strong” version of the Porter hypothesis is not supported [ 16 ]. Zhan et al proposed that mandatory environmental regulation had a significant negative effect on the improvement of green-development efficiency by changing technical progress [ 17 ]. Lanoie et al provided an empirical analysis, and found that environmental regulation on productivity was negative, while the opposite result was observed with lagged regulatory-variables in Quebec [ 18 ].…”
This paper employs the SBM-DDF method to measure the index of green total-factor productivity (GTFP), based on the panel data of 279 prefecture-level cities in China from 2007 to 2019, and constructs a spatial Durbin model (SDM) and a threshold effect to empirically test the effects of dual environmental-regulations and green technological innovation on GTFP. The results are as follows: (1) the SDM supports a nonlinear contribution of dual environmental-regulations spillover to GTFP. The relationship between formal environmental-regulation and GTFP is an inverted U-shape, while a U-shaped nonlinear relationship is found between informal environmental regulation and GTFP. (2) Green technology innovation has a significant negative moderating effect on the process of dual environmental-regulations affecting GTFP in local regions, but a positive moderating effect on informal environmental regulation in neighboring regions. (3) There is a significant green technology innovation threshold effect of dual environmental-regulations affecting GTFP. Specifically, the promotion effect of dual environmental-regulations on GFFP gradually increases as the level of green technology innovation increases.
“…The “strong” version of the Porter hypothesis is not supported [ 16 ]. Zhan et al proposed that mandatory environmental regulation had a significant negative effect on the improvement of green-development efficiency by changing technical progress [ 17 ]. Lanoie et al provided an empirical analysis, and found that environmental regulation on productivity was negative, while the opposite result was observed with lagged regulatory-variables in Quebec [ 18 ].…”
This paper employs the SBM-DDF method to measure the index of green total-factor productivity (GTFP), based on the panel data of 279 prefecture-level cities in China from 2007 to 2019, and constructs a spatial Durbin model (SDM) and a threshold effect to empirically test the effects of dual environmental-regulations and green technological innovation on GTFP. The results are as follows: (1) the SDM supports a nonlinear contribution of dual environmental-regulations spillover to GTFP. The relationship between formal environmental-regulation and GTFP is an inverted U-shape, while a U-shaped nonlinear relationship is found between informal environmental regulation and GTFP. (2) Green technology innovation has a significant negative moderating effect on the process of dual environmental-regulations affecting GTFP in local regions, but a positive moderating effect on informal environmental regulation in neighboring regions. (3) There is a significant green technology innovation threshold effect of dual environmental-regulations affecting GTFP. Specifically, the promotion effect of dual environmental-regulations on GFFP gradually increases as the level of green technology innovation increases.
“…Therefore, we incorporated both expected and unexpected outputs into the green TFP indicator system. Using the slack-based measure (SBM) directional distance function [ 51 , 52 ] with a nondirectional and variable returns-to-scale model, we measured green TFP using the Malmquist–Luenberge (ML) productivity index ( Eq 1 ): …”
Under the ongoing implementation of the “dual carbon” goal, research has focused on the impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) initiatives on green innovation. However, few studies have analyzed in depth the mechanisms of ESG impact on green total factor productivity (green TFP). Here, we explored the impact of ESG performance on green TFP, green technical efficiency, and green technological progress using A-share listed companies in China’s Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2011 to 2021. The results show that good ESG performance can significantly improve the green TFP of enterprises, and that this effect is more prominent in industries with lower environmental risks and enterprises in the growth and maturity stages. We identified the importance of the psychological account path and propose that the promotional effect of ESG performance on green TFP mainly derives from improving green technical efficiency, rather than from expanding green technological boundaries. These findings have practical implications for guiding companies to implement ESG concepts, strengthening the synergistic role of government regulation and professional supervision, and promoting micro-level implementation of innovation-driven and sustainable development strategies, thereby promoting high-quality development.
“…There are few studies on the relationship between all of them. Although some literature find that technological innovation affects the green development effect of environmental regulation (Zhan et al, 2023), few studies find the role form of technological innovation. Scholars agree that the improvement of innovation level has a positive impact on green development (Ouyang et al, 2020;Ren et al, 2023a).…”
Section: Environmental Regulation Technological Innovation and Green ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars used the differential method to evaluate the effect of specific policies. For example, they found that the implementation of the Air Pollution Control Action Plan would inhibit the efficiency of green development (Zhan et al, 2023). It can be found that the classification of environmental regulations by pollutants and periods is not common.…”
Section: Measurement Of Environmental Regulationmentioning
Based on panel data of 286 prefecture-level cities in China, this study analyzes the direct impact of environmental regulation and its classified policies on green development, while exploring the indirect effects and threshold effects of technological innovation in the green development effect of environmental regulation. There are four main findings in this study. 1) The impact of environmental regulation on green development follows a U shaped pattern and its mode varies with the type of environmental regulation and the type of cities. 2) Environmental regulation can promote green development through technological innovation, and the industrial structure has a positive moderating effect. 3) Technological innovation is a threshold variable in the impact of environmental regulation on green development: when technological innovation surpasses the threshold value, the green development effect of environmental regulation changes from negative to positive. Therefore, governments should strengthen environmental regulation, effectively play the driving role of different environmental regulation policies, and transform the development driving force through strengthened technological innovation to achieve regional green development.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.