2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4936604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of magnetization anisotropy and paramagnetic susceptibility on the magnetization process

Abstract: The Sucksmith-Thompson method is a widespread technique for the accurate evaluation of magnetocrystalline anisotropy constants K1 and K2 of a single crystal with easy magnetization axis or basal plane type magnetic anisotropy. In this work, a generalized form of the method is represented. It takes into account several magnetization process features: spontaneous magnetization anisotropy, high-field differential susceptibility (paramagnetic process), and stray fields in terms of the demagnetizing factor. Correct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the difference in magnetic behaviour along the two field directions can also possibly be associated with the presence of large magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy caused by the intrinsic strong spin-orbit coupling [28]. In general, the anisotropic behaviour in a magnetic material is believed to originate from the intrinsic atomic magnetic moments associated with magnetocrystalline anisotropy [31]. As a consequence of magnetocrystalline anisotropy, the anisotropy in magnetization is observed in our measurement data [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Besides, the difference in magnetic behaviour along the two field directions can also possibly be associated with the presence of large magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy caused by the intrinsic strong spin-orbit coupling [28]. In general, the anisotropic behaviour in a magnetic material is believed to originate from the intrinsic atomic magnetic moments associated with magnetocrystalline anisotropy [31]. As a consequence of magnetocrystalline anisotropy, the anisotropy in magnetization is observed in our measurement data [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The plots of χ −1 vs. T above the magnetic transition T C exhibit a strong curvilinear behaviour in both directions. In addition, the distinct behaviour in inverse magnetic susceptibility data is observed along the two directions that is likely due to the strong magnetocrystalline anisotropy where χ −1 data along c-axis is four times larger than that in ab-plane [31,32]. An unusual divergence in the PM region from CW linear behaviour is observed above T C in the H c direction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In such a case, the slope and intercept of an H/M vs M 2 plot will correspond to , respectively [21]. The applicability of the Sucksmith and Thompson method to various magneto-crystalline anisotropy scheme has been confirmed from modelling studies [22] and used in different materials with a combination of easy plane and hard c axis [23,24]. Beside systematic error, due to the significant relative error on magnetization, the differences between maxima and minima for the intercepts and slopes of H in /M vs (μ 0 M) 2 linear fits are large too, resulting in sizable uncertainties on K 1 and K 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This model yields a value of K u = 50 kJ/m 3 at 1.8 K. Similar anisotropy constants were obtained by fitting the data using the Sucksmith−Thompson method (see the Supporting Information). 66,67 To further assess the uniaxial character of the magnetic anisotropy in 2, we performed variable-temperature magnetization measurements to determine the temperature dependence of K u (Figure 4c). In the classical model developed by Zener, 68 the relationship between the anisotropy energy and the saturation magnetization can be described as:…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%