2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of low-mobile foot posture on multi-segment medial foot model gait kinematics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
32
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this difference was due to greater eversion excursion during initial contact rather than during midstance or propulsion as in our study. Other studies that used different reference positions to ours report inconsistent results, with two finding greater peak eversion in pes planus [3,21] compared to three that found no significant differences [8,26,27].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this difference was due to greater eversion excursion during initial contact rather than during midstance or propulsion as in our study. Other studies that used different reference positions to ours report inconsistent results, with two finding greater peak eversion in pes planus [3,21] compared to three that found no significant differences [8,26,27].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…These findings suggest that pes cavus (high medial longitudinal arch) and pes planus (low medial longitudinal arch) may display abnormal biomechanical parameters that predispose an individual to injury. For example, planus feet demonstrate more motion compared to normal feet during gait [3] and as a consequence, may be susceptible to injuries in soft tissues that oppose this motion [4]. In contrast, cavus feet are thought to exhibit less motion [5] compared to planus feet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also reported different results regarding range of motion (ROM). While some studies observed a decreased ankle ROM of pronated feet in the sagittal plane [15], [16] and increased in the frontal plane [15], [17], [18], other works found no significant differences in any motion plane [19], [20]. At the midtarsal joint, one study observed a decrease in the ROM for pronated feet in the transverse plane [13], although others found no significant differences in any motion plane [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Variation from normal foot posture has long been thought to influence function of the foot and lower limb during gait, thereby predisposing to injury [1]. While the link between altered foot posture and injury is still unclear, several studies have demonstrated that foot posture influences lower limb muscle electromyographic (EMG) activity [2] and joint kinematics [3][4][5] during gait.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%