“…Recent studies using a similar estimation method are Ermisch and Francesconi (), Siedler (), Francesconi et al . (), Currie et al . () and Anderson et al .…”
Section: Effect Of Family Non‐intactness During Childhood On Adult CImentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An extensive body of research across a range of disciplines has identified childhood family structure as a key determinant of children's later life socio-economic outcomes, emphasizing that children who grow up in a non-intact family tend to perform less well in school and to gain lower educational qualifications than children from intact families (Case et al, 2001;Ermisch et al, 2004;Gruber, 2004), are more likely to leave home when young and to become sexually active or pregnant at an early age (McLanahan and Sandefur, 1994) and tend to report higher levels of smoking (Francesconi et al, 2010a). However, one aspect of childhood family structure has remained largely neglected in the literature: its influence on children's later life civic engagement.…”
Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. www.econstor.eu
Terms of use:
Documents in
D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E S
ABSTRACT Political Socialization in Flux? Linking Family Non-Intactness during Childhood to Adult Civic EngagementSome sociologists argue that non-intact family structures during childhood have a negative effect on adult children's civic engagement, since they undermine, and in some cases prevent, the processes and activities through which parents shape their children's political attitudes and orientations. In this paper, we evaluate this hypothesis on the basis of longitudinal data from the German Socio-Economic Panel. In a first step, we construct various measures of family structure during childhood, and perform both cross-sectional and sibling difference analyses for different indicators of young adults' civic engagement. Both exercises reveal a significant negative relationship between growing up in a non-intact family and children's political engagement as adults. In a second step, we implement a novel technique -proposed by Oster (2014) -for evaluating robustness of results to omitted variable bias. The distinctive feature of this technique is that it accounts for both coefficient movements and movements in R-squared values after the inclusion of controls. Results suggest that our estimates do not suffer from omitted variable bias.JEL Classification: J12, C23
“…Recent studies using a similar estimation method are Ermisch and Francesconi (), Siedler (), Francesconi et al . (), Currie et al . () and Anderson et al .…”
Section: Effect Of Family Non‐intactness During Childhood On Adult CImentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An extensive body of research across a range of disciplines has identified childhood family structure as a key determinant of children's later life socio-economic outcomes, emphasizing that children who grow up in a non-intact family tend to perform less well in school and to gain lower educational qualifications than children from intact families (Case et al, 2001;Ermisch et al, 2004;Gruber, 2004), are more likely to leave home when young and to become sexually active or pregnant at an early age (McLanahan and Sandefur, 1994) and tend to report higher levels of smoking (Francesconi et al, 2010a). However, one aspect of childhood family structure has remained largely neglected in the literature: its influence on children's later life civic engagement.…”
Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. www.econstor.eu
Terms of use:
Documents in
D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E S
ABSTRACT Political Socialization in Flux? Linking Family Non-Intactness during Childhood to Adult Civic EngagementSome sociologists argue that non-intact family structures during childhood have a negative effect on adult children's civic engagement, since they undermine, and in some cases prevent, the processes and activities through which parents shape their children's political attitudes and orientations. In this paper, we evaluate this hypothesis on the basis of longitudinal data from the German Socio-Economic Panel. In a first step, we construct various measures of family structure during childhood, and perform both cross-sectional and sibling difference analyses for different indicators of young adults' civic engagement. Both exercises reveal a significant negative relationship between growing up in a non-intact family and children's political engagement as adults. In a second step, we implement a novel technique -proposed by Oster (2014) -for evaluating robustness of results to omitted variable bias. The distinctive feature of this technique is that it accounts for both coefficient movements and movements in R-squared values after the inclusion of controls. Results suggest that our estimates do not suffer from omitted variable bias.JEL Classification: J12, C23
“…More recently, several studies have also found early‐life conditions as a relevant determinant of health inequalities with a large range of social background factors, such as low parental socioeconomic status (e.g. Currie and Stabile, , Case et al , , Lindeboom et al , , Rosa‐Dias, , Jusot et al , , Trannoy et al , ); family issues, such as living in a single parent family or experiencing marital discord (Case and Katz, , Francesconi et al , ); parents’ health status (Trannoy et al , ); or health‐risk lifestyles (Anda et al , , Göhlmann et al , , Jusot et al , ). However, the importance of lifestyles in the magnitude of health inequalities is less clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marmot et al , , Case et al , , Trannoy et al , ). Moreover, parents’ lifestyles and social status as well as early‐life conditions would also be associated with health‐related behaviours in later life such as smoking (Rosa‐Dias, ; Göhlmann et al , ; Francesconi et al , ), alcohol consumption (Anda et al , ); obesity (Power et al , ; Laitinen et al , ; von Hinke Kessler Scholder, ). In the sense that early‐life conditions such as parents’ lifestyles, socioeconomic status as well as childhood economic conditions are individual characteristics from childhood, one would agree that they are causal factors of adult education and lifestyles.…”
The paper focuses on the long-term effects of early-life conditions with comparison to lifestyles and educational attainment on health status in a cohort of British people born in 1958. Using the longitudinal follow-up data at age 23, 33, 42 and 46, we build a dynamic model to investigate the influence of each determinant on health and the mediating role of education and lifestyles in the relationship between early-life conditions and later health. Direct and indirect effects of early-life conditions on adult health are explored using auxiliary linear regressions of education and lifestyles and panel Probit specifications of self-assessed health with random effects addressing individual unexplained heterogeneity. Our study shows that early-life conditions are important parameters for adult health accounting for almost 20% of explained health inequality when mediating effects are identified. The contribution of lifestyles reduces from 32% down to 25% when indirect effects of early-life conditions and education are distinguished. Noticeably, the absence of father at the time of birth and experience of financial hardships represent the lead factors for direct effects on health. The absence of obesity at 16 influences health both directly and indirectly working through lifestyles.
“…For example, smoking initiation has been found to be related to mother's education and parents' smoking behaviour (Rosa-Dias, 2009;Göhlmann et al, 2010;Power et al, 2005). Living with a lone mother during childhood seems to be also associated with greater risks of smoking among young adults (Francesconi et al, 2010). Alcohol consumption among young adults has also been related to father's alcohol consumption (Zhang et al, 1999) and alcoholism in adulthood is also more frequent among individuals who have known adverse childhood circumstances and whose parents were alcohol addicts (Anda et al, 2002).…”
The way to treat the correlation between circumstances and effort is a central, yet largely neglected issue in the applied literature on inequality of opportunity. This paper adopts three alternative normative ways of treating this correlation championed by Roemer, Barry and Swift and assesses their empirical relevance using survey data. We combine regression analysis with the natural decomposition of the variance to compare the relative contributions of circumstances and efforts to overall health inequality according to the different normative principles. Our results suggest that, in practice, the normative principle on the way to treat the correlation between circumstances and effort makes little difference on the relative contributions of circumstances and efforts to explained health inequality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.