1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0961-9534(97)00022-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of location and facility demand on the marginal cost of delivered wood chips from energy crops: A case study of the state of Tennessee

Abstract: Cost-supply curves for delivered wood chips from short rotation woody crops were calculated for 21 regularly-spaced locations spanning the state of Tennessee. These curves were used to systematically evaluate the combined effects of location and facility demand on wood chip feedstock costs in Tennessee. The cost-supply curves were developed using BRAVO, a GIS-based decision support system which calculates marginal cost of delivering wood chips to a specific location given road network maps and maps of farmgate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As densification technologies continue to improve and as national and global biofuels industries emerge, biomass resources will be shipped greater distances, potentially increasing the variability of biomass received at biorefineries as well as offering new opportunities to reduce variability through wider supply and blending. However, issues of low bulk mass and energy densities must be addressed to keep transportation costs economical [51,52]. It is important to understand all potential sources of variability in order to expand the current feedstock supply and to mitigate factors that will cause fluctuations in product quality.…”
Section: Defining the Extent Of Biomass Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As densification technologies continue to improve and as national and global biofuels industries emerge, biomass resources will be shipped greater distances, potentially increasing the variability of biomass received at biorefineries as well as offering new opportunities to reduce variability through wider supply and blending. However, issues of low bulk mass and energy densities must be addressed to keep transportation costs economical [51,52]. It is important to understand all potential sources of variability in order to expand the current feedstock supply and to mitigate factors that will cause fluctuations in product quality.…”
Section: Defining the Extent Of Biomass Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in order to develop this type of study for a spatial application, it is necessary to previously conduct an approach similar to the one that MICHELAZZO (2005) carried out, when analyzed the rising of straw recovery costs related to the distance, thereby establishing the logistic cost of straw recovery. Moreover, taking into consideration the capital and operational costs, it is necessary to establish the recovery cost that is embedded in each route of straw recovery, described in some studies of biomass logistics as farmgate price, which means the cost that the plant have to pay for the biomass supplier, regardless of the logistic cost (GRAHAM et al, 1997). It is also worth to note that information about secondary roads or non-paved roads is scarce, for this reason, it is essential to incorporate a non-linearity factor in the distance between the area of collection and the mill (MONFORTI et al, 2013).…”
Section: Geotechnologies In Agro-energy Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we consider each case with either high moisture (50% as harvested) or low builds upon previous systems and analyses developed over the last several years. [10][11][12][13][14] SCM is a geographically based modeling system for locating biorefi neries and predicting the associated supplies (price and quantity) of bioenergy feedstocks. SCM combines geographic estimates of feedstock supply with a transportation network to either select optimal locations for biorefi neries or to identify the lowest-cost feedstock supplies for a set of predefi ned locations.…”
Section: Feedstock Supply Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%