1989
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90021-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of lithium on pupillary response to pulses of light in sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously found our method sensitive enough to discriminate response to light stimuli that differed in intensity by 1 log unit (8). This compares very favourably with similar sensitivity of the pupil to different light intensities in the human (13).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have previously found our method sensitive enough to discriminate response to light stimuli that differed in intensity by 1 log unit (8). This compares very favourably with similar sensitivity of the pupil to different light intensities in the human (13).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This method proved advantageous in demonstrating the effect of drugs on perception (8) in comparison with other techniques used in humans (9). Furthermore, the technique was sufficiently sensitive to delineate a dose response curve for pupil size to light over an intensity range of 0 -150 uW/cm2 (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The size of the sheep pupil, like that of presumably most ungulates, depends on degree of ambient illumination (Seggie et al, 1989). Although the range of pupil movements in most ungulates is unclear, what seems certain is that their horizontally oblong or circular pupils do not close down as much as the slit-like pupils of animals such as cats (Section 3.1.2.3.5; Fig.…”
Section: Ungulatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, observations that serotonin precursors and agonists decrease the phaseshifting response to light (Glass et al, 1995;Rea et al, 1994), and that clorgyline elevates 5-HT within the SCN (Ozaki et al, 1993), raise the possibility that clorgyline's enhancement of 5-HT function may mediate clorgyline's attenuating effect on the pacemaker's phase-shifting response to light. With regard to lithium, there is also substantial evidence that it enhances serotonergic neurotransmission (de Montigny, 1981;de Montigny et al, 1988;Muller-Oerlinghausen 1985;Price et al, 1990) and alters retinal and pupillary func-tion (Reme et al, 1987(Reme et al, , 1988(Reme et al, , 1990Seggie, 1988;Seggie et al, 1989aSeggie et al, , 1989b. Therefore, it is possible that lithium's capacity to modify the effect of light input on the circadian pacemaker may be responsible for its reported capacity to facilitate entrainment to LD cycles that have periods greater than 24 h (McEachron et al, 1981;Reinhard, 1985;Schweizer et al, 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%