2022
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000029567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of lexical tone experience on English intonation perception in Mandarin-speaking cochlear-implanted children

Abstract: To examine the effect of lexical tone experience on English intonation perception in Mandarin-speaking cochlear-implanted children during second language acquisition in Taiwan. A retrospective cohort study. A tertiary referred center. Fourteen children with cochlear implant (CI) in the experimental group, and 9 normal hearing children in the control group were enrolled in this study. Cochlear implantation and hearing rehabilitation. Two speech recognition accuracies were examined: (1) Lexical tone recognition … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Normal hearing (NH) listeners of tonal languages can use pitch cues to distinguish lexical tones robustly even when acoustic signals are degraded by environmental noise, low-fidelity playback, human speech production variability, etc. In contrast, for most cochlear implant (CI) recipients, lexical tone perception is still challenging (Lu et al, 2022 ), and performance varies significantly across recipients and in environments (Chang et al, 2016 ; Liu et al, 2017 ; Mao and Xu, 2017 ; Li et al, 2018 ; Tang et al, 2019 ). This is perhaps unsurprising given CI recipients' weaker and more variable abilities to extract pitch cues from acoustic signals (Tao et al, 2015 ; Mok et al, 2017 ; Vandali et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normal hearing (NH) listeners of tonal languages can use pitch cues to distinguish lexical tones robustly even when acoustic signals are degraded by environmental noise, low-fidelity playback, human speech production variability, etc. In contrast, for most cochlear implant (CI) recipients, lexical tone perception is still challenging (Lu et al, 2022 ), and performance varies significantly across recipients and in environments (Chang et al, 2016 ; Liu et al, 2017 ; Mao and Xu, 2017 ; Li et al, 2018 ; Tang et al, 2019 ). This is perhaps unsurprising given CI recipients' weaker and more variable abilities to extract pitch cues from acoustic signals (Tao et al, 2015 ; Mok et al, 2017 ; Vandali et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%