1965
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of leptazol and strychnine on the acetylcholine release from the cat brain.

Abstract: In anaesthetized cats perfusion of the cerebral ventricles with an anticholinesterase provides a simple method for studying the effect of centrally active drugs on the release of acetylcholine from structures bordering the ventricular cavities. On perfusion with neostigmine from lateral ventricle to aqueduct, acetylcholine appears in the effluent and this acetylcholine is mainly derived from the caudate nucleus (Bhattacharya & Feldberg, 1958c;Beleslin, Carmichael & Feldberg, 1964); this output is reduced by mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

1968
1968
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with those of Celesia & Jasper (1966), who applied strychnine topically to the brain of the cat and obtained only a 50% increase in ACh release from the cortex even when generalized strychninization with widespread discharges had occurred. The results differ from those of Beleslin et al (1965), however, who obtained with intravenous strychnine a large increase in the ACh release from the parietal cortex of the cat. Their different result may be due to the use of the intravenous route of administration of strychnine in contrast to intraperitoneal injection or topical application, but this would not explain why the ACh release was so much smaller in these two conditions in spite of the relatively strong effect on the electrical activity of the brain.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are in agreement with those of Celesia & Jasper (1966), who applied strychnine topically to the brain of the cat and obtained only a 50% increase in ACh release from the cortex even when generalized strychninization with widespread discharges had occurred. The results differ from those of Beleslin et al (1965), however, who obtained with intravenous strychnine a large increase in the ACh release from the parietal cortex of the cat. Their different result may be due to the use of the intravenous route of administration of strychnine in contrast to intraperitoneal injection or topical application, but this would not explain why the ACh release was so much smaller in these two conditions in spite of the relatively strong effect on the electrical activity of the brain.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The increased ACh release produced by leptazol confirms findings of Mitchell (1963), Beleslin, Polak & Sproull (1965) and Celesia & Jasper (1966). The large increase in ACh release caused by leptazol was accompanied by a correspondingly large increase in the electrical activity of the brain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Convulsant drugs such as leptazol have been shown to increase ACh output in cats (Mitchell, 1963;Beleslin et al, 1965;Celesia & Jasper, 1966), and rats (Hemsworth & Neal, 1968). That nicotine caused the opposite effect may result from differences in site of action because nicotine induces seizure discharge by an action on the hippocampus (Floris et al, 1964) whereas leptazol exerts its effects on other cortical and subcortical structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may also explain the anticonvulsant effect of diazepines against pentetrazol. This drug probably has no GABA-or glycine-antagonistic properties which could explain its convulsant activity, but has stimulatory effects on cholinergic neuronal activity, emanating from a massive release of acetylcholine (Beleslin et al, 1965;Hemsworth & Neal, 1968).…”
Section: Acetylcholinementioning
confidence: 99%