2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-009-0227-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of length to diameter ratio of test specimens on the uniaxial compressive strength of rock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared the slenderness effect results of this study with other numerical and experimental results for rock specimens [41][42][43], of which deformability had a reverse evolution trend. We speculated that the reason may lie on the tortuosity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compared the slenderness effect results of this study with other numerical and experimental results for rock specimens [41][42][43], of which deformability had a reverse evolution trend. We speculated that the reason may lie on the tortuosity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Further research on other types of tests will be reported elsewhere. The size effect of the specimens on uniaxial compression process has been investigated extensively in other geotechnical materials such as rock [40][41][42][43], jointed rock mass [44], and concrete [45]. Those researches provide useful datasets for comparison with our study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ten volcanic specimens (1 riolite, 2 diabase, 1 andesitic basalt, 1 andesite and 5 basalt) were collected from different locations of volcanic area in the Armutlu Peninsula. The specimens used for the investigation are 54 mm diameter and 110 mm long cylindrical samples, which would be acceptable for ASTM [7÷10], or ISRM [11,12]. In the preparation of the specimens, special care was taken to ensure parallel ends and perpendicular to the longitudinal axis.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to ASTM D7012-13 [28], L/D needs to be between 2.0:1 and 2.5:1 and specimens with L/D less than 2.0:1 are unacceptable. According to other researchers [39,40], specimens with L/D less than 2.0:1 exhibit larger strength compared to specimens with L/D equal to 2.0:1. Despite the small L/D of the specimens, they were utilized since longer specimens could not be obtained.…”
Section: Comparison Between Shear Strength At Room Temperature and 20mentioning
confidence: 99%