2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of length scale on the determination of geometrically necessary dislocations via EBSD continuum dislocation microscopy

Abstract: Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) dislocation microscopy is an important, emerging field in metals characterization. Currently, calculation of geometrically necessary dislocation (GND) density is problematic because it has been shown to depend on the step size of the EBSD scan used to investigate the sample. This paper models the change in calculated GND density as a function of step size statistically. The model provides selection criteria for EBSD step size as well as an estimate of the total dislocati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This simple approach contrasts with those employed in previous work on metals where the multitude of slip systems requires additional assumptions or constraints to select one of many possible combinations of dislocation types and densities to fit the measured lattice orientation gradients (Jiang et al, ; Wilkinson & Randman, ). The apparent density of GNDs depends on the mapping step size and, to a lesser extent, on the binning of pixels in diffraction patterns (Jiang et al, ; Ruggles et al, ; Wallis et al, ). Wallis et al () presented a detailed assessment of these effects for the same map of PI‐1433 as used in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This simple approach contrasts with those employed in previous work on metals where the multitude of slip systems requires additional assumptions or constraints to select one of many possible combinations of dislocation types and densities to fit the measured lattice orientation gradients (Jiang et al, ; Wilkinson & Randman, ). The apparent density of GNDs depends on the mapping step size and, to a lesser extent, on the binning of pixels in diffraction patterns (Jiang et al, ; Ruggles et al, ; Wallis et al, ). Wallis et al () presented a detailed assessment of these effects for the same map of PI‐1433 as used in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then dislocation analysis from EBSD data is discussed. The main drawbacks of using EBSD data for quantitative analysis are related to the influence of the measurement noise and of the EBSD mapping step size [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. A method based on the one originally proposed by Kamaya [21], described in the section 3.1, is applied to reduce those drawbacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, EBSD analysis can be performed with step sizes as low as 20 nm (e.g. Ruggles et al ., ), allowing for the analysis of ultrafine material. Although the quality of FA pole figures is exceptionally lower than EBSD and ND techniques (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%