1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00722325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of lanthanide contraction on grain growth in lanthanide-doped BaTiO3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter analogy implies that Ba-loss would be partially accommodated by dopant partitioning across the A and B sites, leading to resultant decreases in point defect concentrations and impairment of grain growth [36,37]. Note that the latter analogy has also been widely proposed to explain grain-growth inhibition in doped BaTiO 3 materials [38]. At higher amounts of P 2 O 5 ( 44 mol%), the trend is reversed and grain size is slightly increased.…”
Section: Phase Analysis and Microstructurementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The latter analogy implies that Ba-loss would be partially accommodated by dopant partitioning across the A and B sites, leading to resultant decreases in point defect concentrations and impairment of grain growth [36,37]. Note that the latter analogy has also been widely proposed to explain grain-growth inhibition in doped BaTiO 3 materials [38]. At higher amounts of P 2 O 5 ( 44 mol%), the trend is reversed and grain size is slightly increased.…”
Section: Phase Analysis and Microstructurementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Ce 3ϩ incorporated at Ba sites acts as a donor dopant. and microstructure of BaTiO 3 ceramics, it was concluded Donor dopants have a higher valency than the substituted that Ce could also act as a donor dopant when CeO 2 -doped ions, and therefore their incorporation requires formation BaTiO 3 is sintered in air (5,18). In this case Ce 4ϩ must of effectively negatively charged defects, e.g., cation vacan-be reduce to Ce 3ϩ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Sir Richard J. Brook performed early pioneering work on both microstructural evolution during sintering, and the optimization of processing and microstructures through the use of additives. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Prof. Brook's classic work on modeling pore-boundary interactions is a mainstay of sintering and grain growth textbooks. 17 Brook maps 17 have provided an easy and convenient way of visualizing a complex problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%