The Effect of Land-Use Categories on Traffic Noise Annoyance

Abstract

Land-use categories are often used to define the exposure limits of national environmental noise policies. Often different guideline values for noise are applied for purely residential areas versus residential areas with mixed-use. Mixed-use includes living plus limited activities through crafts, commerce, trade, agriculture, and forestry activities. This differentiation especially when rating noise from road, railway, and air traffic might be argued by different expectations and therefore noise annoyance in those two categories while scientific evidence is missing. It should be tested on empirically derived data. Surveys from two studies in the state of Tyrol in urban and rural areas were retrospectively matched with spatial data to analyze the potential different influences on noise effects. Using non-parametric tests, the correlation between land-use category on self-reported noise sensitivity and noise annoyance was investigated. Exposure–response for the two analyzed land-use categories showed no significant impact on noise sensitivity and exposure–response relationships for the three traffic noise sources. Including only noise annoyance, there is not sufficient evidence to define different noise policies for those two land-use categories.

Ecological Consequences of Railway Infrastructure Development: A Case Study of the Belgrade-Novi Sad Corridor

“…This study illuminated the importance of recognizing key ecological features, such as habitats and corridors, to sustain ecological connectivity. It proposed the application of Geographic Information System (GIS) technology for identification of ecologically sensitive areas, establishment of ecological corridors, and prioritization of conservation efforts (Lechner & Kirisits, 2022). In addition, land requisition for railway construction can lead to the loss of agricultural land, implicating local communities and food security.…”

Beyond Park Boundaries: Exploring The Effect of Surrounding Land Use on Sound Levels of ParksBeyond Park Boundaries: Exploring The Effect of Surrounding Land Use on Sound Levels of Parks

“…The surrounding land use of a park can affect its sound level. Land use categories are commonly used in national environmental noise polices to determine exposure limits implying the relationship between different land uses and sound level (Lechner et al, 2022;Department of Environment, 2019). According to Ajayi & Adeleke (2022), parks' surrounding with mixed-use land use including living and other activities records higher noise levels as compared to parks surrounded by purely residential areas.…”

“…In contrast, residential areas have lower sound levels because they consist of residences and living spaces, with the noise levels influenced by the population density of the residential area and the commercial or industrial activities (King et al, 2012). Mixed use areas, where commercial and residential land uses coexist, may experience elevated noise levels because of the combination of various noise sources and human activities (Lechner & Kirisits, 2022).…”